Location: List Archives

List Archives

This forum is an archive of all posts to our mailing list over the past few years.  The forum is set read only therefore to contribute you will need to join our list community.  See more info about this here.

 

When subscribed to the list you should use your standard email client to send your posts to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org.

List Archives

Subject: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack
Prev Next
You are not authorized to post a reply.

Page 2 of 2<< < 12
AuthorMessages
jw1User is Offline

Posts:0

11/21/2006 4:40 AM  
This is by design...we aren't going to have the GUI option for alternate credentials anymore - command line elevation is the only option...


--James

________________________________

From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of WATSON, BEN
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 12:43 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

Run As...



Now that the AD snap-ins are working, has anyone else noticed that you are not given a means to enter alternate credentials to launch snap-ins in Vista through the GUI? Under XP, I don't log in with my Domain Admin credentials, but perform a Run As when necessary to launch ADUC and other snap-ins.
When I attempt to perform a Run As in Vista (through the GUI), it just goes on ahead and launches ADUC without ever prompting for the alternative credentials.



Anyone else experiencing this?



I am able to get around this by launching an elevated command prompt and launching MMC from there.



~Ben



From: WATSON, BEN
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 10:32 AM
To: 'ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



Ah! Thanks for that tidbit of info. I wrongly assumed that it ran under the same context as the currently logged on user like XP did.



That immediately solved the problem, thanks Ronnie! Worked like a charm.



~Ben



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Ronnie.Miller@shawinc.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 8:16 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack


Make sure you run the .cmd file, or cmd.exe as Administrator (right click on it, Run as Administrator). I did still get a few errors on some DLLs, but I assumed that they were DLLs that didn't need to be registered. My ADUC console works fine now.

"WATSON, BEN"
Sent by: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org

11/21/2006 10:25 AM

Please respond to
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org


To




cc


Subject

RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack








I found this write up from someone else yesterday, I can't remember where now. I tried it immediately and ran into a couple immediate errors when trying to register these DLLs and the Active Directory snap-ins still continued to be non-functional. This is using the Win2003 SP1 admin pack on Vista
Business RTM. Basically, I threw all those commands into a text file named register.cmd and let it run.

Certtmpl.dll - Your user account does not have necessary access rights to register the Certificate Templates snap-in. Log on with a different user account and try again, or contact your system administrator. (I am local admin on this Vista box).

Mprsnap.dll - Access is denied. (80070005)

Even those two DLLs don't seem to be related to the Active Directory snap-ins, I still get the error that the MMC could not create the snap-in.

Anyone else run into this?

~Ben

From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Steve Linehan
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 10:39 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

KB is in the works, just takes time. Feel free to blog it or I can if I get some time this week, it is a bit slow this week but I have a backlog of content that I was supposed to have blogged. Good news is that I accepted a new role at Microsoft where maintaining an official blog is part of my
job. J

Thanks,

-Steve

From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 11:45 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

okay if you aren't going to blog or KB that .. may someone on this list?

Steve Linehan wrote:
You can install the Windows Server 2003 SP1 admin pack on Vista RTM, a shim was added to support this. Once it is installed you will need to register the DLLs needed for the various snap-ins manually from an elevated command prompt. Here is a complete list in case you need them:

regsvr32 /s adprop.dll
regsvr32 /s azroles.dll
regsvr32 /s azroleui.dll
regsvr32 /s ccfg95.dll
regsvr32 /s certadm.dll
regsvr32 /s certmmc.dll
regsvr32 /s certpdef.dll
regsvr32 /s certtmpl.dll
regsvr32 /s certxds.dll
regsvr32 /s cladmwiz.dll
regsvr32 /s clcfgsrv.dll
regsvr32 /s clnetrex.dll
regsvr32 /s cluadmex.dll
regsvr32 /s cluadmmc.dll
regsvr32 /s cmproxy.dll
regsvr32 /s cmroute.dll
regsvr32 /s cmutoa.dll
regsvr32 /s cnet16.dll
regsvr32 /s debugex.dll
regsvr32 /s dfscore.dll
regsvr32 /s dfsgui.dll
regsvr32 /s dhcpsnap.dll
regsvr32 /s dnsmgr.dll
regsvr32 /s domadmin.dll
regsvr32 /s dsadmin.dll
regsvr32 /s dsuiwiz.dll
regsvr32 /s imadmui.dll
regsvr32 /s lrwizdll.dll
regsvr32 /s mprsnap.dll
regsvr32 /s msclus.dll
regsvr32 /s mstsmhst.dll
regsvr32 /s mstsmmc.dll
regsvr32 /s nntpadm.dll
regsvr32 /s nntpapi.dll
regsvr32 /s nntpsnap.dll
regsvr32 /s ntdsbsrv.dll
regsvr32 /s ntfrsapi.dll
regsvr32 /s rasuser.dll
regsvr32 /s rigpsnap.dll
regsvr32 /s rsadmin.dll
regsvr32 /s rscommon.dll
regsvr32 /s rsconn.dll
regsvr32 /s rsengps.dll
regsvr32 /s rsjob.dll
regsvr32 /s rsservps.dll
regsvr32 /s rsshell.dll
regsvr32 /s rssubps.dll
regsvr32 /s rtrfiltr.dll
regsvr32 /s schmmgmt.dll
regsvr32 /s tapisnap.dll
regsvr32 /s tsuserex.dll
regsvr32 /s uddi.mmc.dll
regsvr32 /s vsstskex.dll
regsvr32 /s w95inf16.dll
regsvr32 /s w95inf32.dll
regsvr32 /s winsevnt.dll
regsvr32 /s winsmon.dll
regsvr32 /s winsrpc.dll
regsvr32 /s winssnap.dll
regsvr32 /s ws03res.dll

Thanks,

-Steve

From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org ] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 9:47 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

> I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should be quickly on the way soon for Vista

Errr.... That struck me a little funny... What exactly in the past would make you even start to assume this. ;o)

History has taught us exactly the opposite though we have been quite vocal in the complaints on the lack of left/right hand coordination on this topic.

If we have something prior to LongHorn RTM I think we will be doing pretty well.

I am an optimistic cynic - I hope for the best and plan for the worst...

--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm






________________________________
From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org ] On Behalf Of WATSON, BEN
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 8:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

With the release of Vista to MSDN as well as the Microsoft Licensing site for download, I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should be quickly on the way soon for Vista. Anyone have any information on when a Vista compatible Adminpak will be available?

I would've run Vista Beta 2 full time on my work desktop to test it out, but with the inability to install the adminpak that severly limited Vista's usefulness to me.

Thanks,

~Ben
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/

**********************************************************
Privileged and/or confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or are not responsible for delivery of this message to that person) , you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message
and notify the sender by reply e-mail.
If you or your employer do not consent to Internet e-mail for messages of this kind, please advise the sender.
Shaw Industries does not provide or endorse any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of the company or its subsidiaries.
**********************************************************

List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
slinehanUser is Offline

Posts:18

11/21/2006 5:32 AM  
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}









I will have to do some additional digging and report back.
As you state there is no difference between launching from an elevated cmd
shell and launching the MSI elevated, I am just a cmd shell junkie. That
being said as I recall the difference between an elevated Windows Explorer and
the others is that Windows Explorer has some additional sand boxing that occurs
so when you spawn the MSI it does not carry that elevation. I will go off
and dig into it further and let you know what I find.

Thanks,

-Steve



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Grillenmeier,
Guido
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 1:56 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



Steve – thanks again for sharing this very useful
information. I’ve tested this with different scenarios and I am
somewhat confused as to some of the “great new features” of how
Vista handles the security of new threads when launching applications:

1.
I can install the AdminPak as non-privileged local user and can
fix the DLL registration in an elevated CMD prompt with your tip below –
works fine.

2.
When I install the AdminPak from an elevated CMD prompt right
away, everything also works fine – no need to manually register the DLLs.

3.
When I start the AdminPak installation from an elevated Windows
Explorer window, it does not successfully register the DLLs and
again I have to register the DLLs manually in an elevated prompt to get them to
work

4.
When I right-click the AdminPak installation file in a Windows Explorer
window and choose “Run as administrator” (i.e. running the install
in elevated mode), it’s the same as when launched from an elevated
command prompt and again everything work fine without the need for manual
registration of DLLs.

So what’s different from launching applications from an
elevated Windows Explorer window to launching them from an elevated CMD prompt?

Thanks for any insights J

/Guido



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Steve Linehan
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 5:46 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



You have to run the batch from a command prompt that is elevated
or you will get access denied. To run a cmd prompt elevated search for
cmd.exe from the start menu and right click selecting “Run As
Administrator”. We have also found that if you simply launch the
MSI from an elevated command prompt it will register the DLLs as well.

Thanks,

-Steve



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of WATSON, BEN
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 9:25 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



I found this write up from someone else yesterday, I can’t
remember where now. I tried it immediately and ran into a couple
immediate errors when trying to register these DLLs and the Active Directory
snap-ins still continued to be non-functional. This is using the Win2003
SP1 admin pack on Vista Business RTM. Basically, I threw all those
commands into a text file named register.cmd and let it run.

Certtmpl.dll – Your user account does not have necessary
access rights to register the Certificate Templates snap-in. Log on with
a different user account and try again, or contact your system
administrator. (I am local admin on this Vista box).

Mprsnap.dll – Access is denied. (80070005)

Even those two DLLs don’t seem to be related to the Active
Directory snap-ins, I still get the error that the MMC could not create the
snap-in.

Anyone else run into this?

~Ben



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Steve Linehan
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 10:39 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



KB is in the works, just takes time. Feel free to blog it
or I can if I get some time this week, it is a bit slow this week but I have a
backlog of content that I was supposed to have blogged. Good news is that
I accepted a new role at Microsoft where maintaining an official blog is part
of my job. J

Thanks,

-Steve



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, CPA
aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 11:45 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



okay if you aren't going to blog or KB that .. may someone
on this list?

Steve Linehan wrote:

You can install the Windows Server 2003 SP1 admin pack on Vista
RTM, a shim was added to support this. Once it is installed you will need
to register the DLLs needed for the various snap-ins manually from an elevated
command prompt. Here is a complete list in case you need them:

regsvr32 /s adprop.dll

regsvr32 /s azroles.dll

regsvr32 /s azroleui.dll

regsvr32 /s ccfg95.dll

regsvr32 /s certadm.dll

regsvr32 /s certmmc.dll

regsvr32 /s certpdef.dll

regsvr32 /s certtmpl.dll

regsvr32 /s certxds.dll

regsvr32 /s cladmwiz.dll

regsvr32 /s clcfgsrv.dll

regsvr32 /s clnetrex.dll

regsvr32 /s cluadmex.dll

regsvr32 /s cluadmmc.dll

regsvr32 /s cmproxy.dll

regsvr32 /s cmroute.dll

regsvr32 /s cmutoa.dll

regsvr32 /s cnet16.dll

regsvr32 /s debugex.dll

regsvr32 /s dfscore.dll

regsvr32 /s dfsgui.dll

regsvr32 /s dhcpsnap.dll

regsvr32 /s dnsmgr.dll

regsvr32 /s domadmin.dll

regsvr32 /s dsadmin.dll

regsvr32 /s dsuiwiz.dll

regsvr32 /s imadmui.dll

regsvr32 /s lrwizdll.dll

regsvr32 /s mprsnap.dll

regsvr32 /s msclus.dll

regsvr32 /s mstsmhst.dll

regsvr32 /s mstsmmc.dll

regsvr32 /s nntpadm.dll

regsvr32 /s nntpapi.dll

regsvr32 /s nntpsnap.dll

regsvr32 /s ntdsbsrv.dll

regsvr32 /s ntfrsapi.dll

regsvr32 /s rasuser.dll

regsvr32 /s rigpsnap.dll

regsvr32 /s rsadmin.dll

regsvr32 /s rscommon.dll

regsvr32 /s rsconn.dll

regsvr32 /s rsengps.dll

regsvr32 /s rsjob.dll

regsvr32 /s rsservps.dll

regsvr32 /s rsshell.dll

regsvr32 /s rssubps.dll

regsvr32 /s rtrfiltr.dll

regsvr32 /s schmmgmt.dll

regsvr32 /s tapisnap.dll

regsvr32 /s tsuserex.dll

regsvr32 /s uddi.mmc.dll

regsvr32 /s vsstskex.dll

regsvr32 /s w95inf16.dll

regsvr32 /s w95inf32.dll

regsvr32 /s winsevnt.dll

regsvr32 /s winsmon.dll

regsvr32 /s winsrpc.dll

regsvr32 /s winssnap.dll

regsvr32 /s ws03res.dll

Thanks,

-Steve



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 9:47 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



> I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should
be quickly on the way soon for Vista

Errr.... That struck me a little funny... What exactly in the past
would make you even start to assume this. ;o)

History has taught us exactly the opposite though we have been
quite vocal in the complaints on the lack of left/right hand coordination on
this topic.

If we have something prior to LongHorn RTM I think we will be doing
pretty well.

I am an optimistic cynic - I hope for the best and plan for the
worst...



--

O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm

From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of WATSON, BEN
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 8:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

With the release of Vista to MSDN as well as the Microsoft Licensing site
for download, I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should be
quickly on the way soon for Vista. Anyone have any information on when a
Vista compatible Adminpak will be available?

I would've run Vista Beta 2 full time on my work desktop to test it out, but
with the inability to install the adminpak that severly limited Vista's
usefulness to me.

Thanks,

~Ben

List info :
http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ :
http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
dwellsUser is Offline

Posts:53

11/21/2006 5:48 AM  
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}









Not tried this specifically myself but I’d hazard a guess
that the behavior is per Windows XP in that when you attempt to launch an additional
Explorer.exe process, it merely triggers additional threads under the existing
process context. To rectify, click the checkbox under Explorer’s View
menu “Launch folder Windows in a separate process” and test again
(or trying modifying the machine’s Hosts file using the elevated explorer
by launching Notepad etc).

Deano



--
Dean
Wells
MSEtechnology
* Email: dwells@msetechnology.com
http://msetechnology.com



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Grillenmeier,
Guido
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 2:56 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



Steve – thanks again for sharing this very useful
information. I’ve tested this with different scenarios and I am
somewhat confused as to some of the “great new features” of how
Vista handles the security of new threads when launching applications:

1.
I can install the AdminPak as non-privileged local user and can
fix the DLL registration in an elevated CMD prompt with your tip below –
works fine.

2.
When I install the AdminPak from an elevated CMD prompt right
away, everything also works fine – no need to manually register the DLLs.

3.
When I start the AdminPak installation from an elevated Windows
Explorer window, it does not successfully register the DLLs and
again I have to register the DLLs manually in an elevated prompt to get them to
work

4.
When I right-click the AdminPak installation file in a Windows
Explorer window and choose “Run as administrator” (i.e. running the
install in elevated mode), it’s the same as when launched from an
elevated command prompt and again everything work fine without the need for
manual registration of DLLs.

So what’s different from launching applications from an
elevated Windows Explorer window to launching them from an elevated CMD prompt?

Thanks for any insights J

/Guido



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Steve Linehan
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 5:46 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



You have to run the batch from a command prompt that is elevated
or you will get access denied. To run a cmd prompt elevated search for
cmd.exe from the start menu and right click selecting “Run As
Administrator”. We have also found that if you simply launch the
MSI from an elevated command prompt it will register the DLLs as well.

Thanks,

-Steve



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of WATSON, BEN
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 9:25 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



I found this write up from someone else yesterday, I can’t
remember where now. I tried it immediately and ran into a couple
immediate errors when trying to register these DLLs and the Active Directory
snap-ins still continued to be non-functional. This is using the Win2003
SP1 admin pack on Vista Business RTM. Basically, I threw all those
commands into a text file named register.cmd and let it run.

Certtmpl.dll – Your user account does not have necessary
access rights to register the Certificate Templates snap-in. Log on with
a different user account and try again, or contact your system
administrator. (I am local admin on this Vista box).

Mprsnap.dll – Access is denied. (80070005)

Even those two DLLs don’t seem to be related to the Active
Directory snap-ins, I still get the error that the MMC could not create the
snap-in.

Anyone else run into this?

~Ben



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Steve Linehan
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 10:39 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



KB is in the works, just takes time. Feel free to blog it
or I can if I get some time this week, it is a bit slow this week but I have a
backlog of content that I was supposed to have blogged. Good news is that
I accepted a new role at Microsoft where maintaining an official blog is part
of my job. J

Thanks,

-Steve



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 11:45 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



okay if you aren't going to blog or KB that .. may someone
on this list?

Steve Linehan wrote:

You can install the Windows Server 2003 SP1 admin pack on Vista
RTM, a shim was added to support this. Once it is installed you will need
to register the DLLs needed for the various snap-ins manually from an elevated
command prompt. Here is a complete list in case you need them:

regsvr32 /s adprop.dll

regsvr32 /s azroles.dll

regsvr32 /s azroleui.dll

regsvr32 /s ccfg95.dll

regsvr32 /s certadm.dll

regsvr32 /s certmmc.dll

regsvr32 /s certpdef.dll

regsvr32 /s certtmpl.dll

regsvr32 /s certxds.dll

regsvr32 /s cladmwiz.dll

regsvr32 /s clcfgsrv.dll

regsvr32 /s clnetrex.dll

regsvr32 /s cluadmex.dll

regsvr32 /s cluadmmc.dll

regsvr32 /s cmproxy.dll

regsvr32 /s cmroute.dll

regsvr32 /s cmutoa.dll

regsvr32 /s cnet16.dll

regsvr32 /s debugex.dll

regsvr32 /s dfscore.dll

regsvr32 /s dfsgui.dll

regsvr32 /s dhcpsnap.dll

regsvr32 /s dnsmgr.dll

regsvr32 /s domadmin.dll

regsvr32 /s dsadmin.dll

regsvr32 /s dsuiwiz.dll

regsvr32 /s imadmui.dll

regsvr32 /s lrwizdll.dll

regsvr32 /s mprsnap.dll

regsvr32 /s msclus.dll

regsvr32 /s mstsmhst.dll

regsvr32 /s mstsmmc.dll

regsvr32 /s nntpadm.dll

regsvr32 /s nntpapi.dll

regsvr32 /s nntpsnap.dll

regsvr32 /s ntdsbsrv.dll

regsvr32 /s ntfrsapi.dll

regsvr32 /s rasuser.dll

regsvr32 /s rigpsnap.dll

regsvr32 /s rsadmin.dll

regsvr32 /s rscommon.dll

regsvr32 /s rsconn.dll

regsvr32 /s rsengps.dll

regsvr32 /s rsjob.dll

regsvr32 /s rsservps.dll

regsvr32 /s rsshell.dll

regsvr32 /s rssubps.dll

regsvr32 /s rtrfiltr.dll

regsvr32 /s schmmgmt.dll

regsvr32 /s tapisnap.dll

regsvr32 /s tsuserex.dll

regsvr32 /s uddi.mmc.dll

regsvr32 /s vsstskex.dll

regsvr32 /s w95inf16.dll

regsvr32 /s w95inf32.dll

regsvr32 /s winsevnt.dll

regsvr32 /s winsmon.dll

regsvr32 /s winsrpc.dll

regsvr32 /s winssnap.dll

regsvr32 /s ws03res.dll

Thanks,

-Steve



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 9:47 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



> I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should
be quickly on the way soon for Vista

Errr.... That struck me a little funny... What exactly in the past would
make you even start to assume this. ;o)

History has taught us exactly the opposite though we have been
quite vocal in the complaints on the lack of left/right hand coordination on
this topic.

If we have something prior to LongHorn RTM I think we will be doing
pretty well.

I am an optimistic cynic - I hope for the best and plan for the
worst...



--

O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm

From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of WATSON, BEN
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 8:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

With the release of Vista to MSDN as well as the Microsoft Licensing site
for download, I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should be
quickly on the way soon for Vista. Anyone have any information on when a
Vista compatible Adminpak will be available?

I would've run Vista Beta 2 full time on my work desktop to test it out, but
with the inability to install the adminpak that severly limited Vista's
usefulness to me.

Thanks,

~Ben

List info :
http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ :
http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
listmailUser is Offline

Posts:824

11/21/2006 5:49 AM  
v\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
o\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
w\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
.shape {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
@font-face {
font-family: Wingdings;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Cambria Math;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Calibri;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Tahoma;
}
@page Section1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in; }
P.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
LI.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
A:link {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
A:visited {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
P {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; COLOR: black; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto
}
P.MsoListParagraph {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 34
}
LI.MsoListParagraph {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 34
}
DIV.MsoListParagraph {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 34
}
P.msochpdefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; COLOR: black; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-style-name: msochpdefault
}
LI.msochpdefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; COLOR: black; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-style-name: msochpdefault
}
DIV.msochpdefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; COLOR: black; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-style-name: msochpdefault
}
SPAN.emailstyle17 {
COLOR: windowtext; FONT-FAMILY: "Arial","sans-serif"; mso-style-name: emailstyle17
}
SPAN.emailstyle21 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-name: emailstyle21
}
SPAN.msoins0 {
COLOR: teal; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-name: msoins
}
SPAN.EmailStyle22 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal
}
SPAN.EmailStyle23 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal
}
SPAN.EmailStyle24 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal
}
SPAN.EmailStyle25 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal
}
SPAN.EmailStyle26 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal-reply
}
.MsoChpDefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-style-type: export-only
}
DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}
OL {
MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0in
}
UL {
MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0in
}






The Vista source isn't available for perusal yet so this is
a complete guess but I expect it is something likeExplorer purposely
"dumbs down"the process token used tolaunch thenew process.
Its just a guess though...

--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm


From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Grillenmeier,
GuidoSent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 2:56 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin
Tools Pack
Steve
– thanks again for sharing this very useful information. I’ve tested this
with different scenarios and I am somewhat confused as to some of the “great new
features” of how Vista handles the security of new threads when launching
applications:

1.
I
can install the AdminPak as non-privileged local user and can fix the DLL
registration in an elevated CMD prompt with your tip below – works
fine.
2.
When
I install the AdminPak from an elevated CMD prompt right away, everything also
works fine – no need to manually register the DLLs.
3.
When
I start the AdminPak installation from an elevated Windows Explorer
window, it does not successfully register the DLLs and again I have to
register the DLLs manually in an elevated prompt to get them to
work
4.
When
I right-click the AdminPak installation file in a Windows Explorer window and
choose “Run as administrator” (i.e. running the install in elevated mode), it’s
the same as when launched from an elevated command prompt and again everything
work fine without the need for manual registration of
DLLs.

So
what’s different from launching applications from an elevated Windows Explorer
window to launching them from an elevated CMD prompt?

Thanks
for any insights J

/Guido

From:
ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of Steve LinehanSent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006
5:46 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE:
[ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

You
have to run the batch from a command prompt that is elevated or you will get
access denied. To run a cmd prompt elevated search for cmd.exe from the
start menu and right click selecting “Run As Administrator”. We have also
found that if you simply launch the MSI from an elevated command prompt it will
register the DLLs as well.

Thanks,

-Steve

From:
ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of WATSON, BENSent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 9:25
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir]
[OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

I
found this write up from someone else yesterday, I can’t remember where
now. I tried it immediately and ran into a couple immediate errors when
trying to register these DLLs and the Active Directory snap-ins still continued
to be non-functional. This is using the Win2003 SP1 admin pack on Vista
Business RTM. Basically, I threw all those commands into a text file named
register.cmd and let it run.

Certtmpl.dll
– Your user account does not have necessary access rights to register the
Certificate Templates snap-in. Log on with a different user account and
try again, or contact your system administrator. (I am local admin on this
Vista box).

Mprsnap.dll
– Access is denied. (80070005)

Even
those two DLLs don’t seem to be related to the Active Directory snap-ins, I
still get the error that the MMC could not create the
snap-in.

Anyone
else run into this?

~Ben

From:
ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of Steve LinehanSent: Monday, November 20, 2006
10:39 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE:
[ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

KB
is in the works, just takes time. Feel free to blog it or I can if I get
some time this week, it is a bit slow this week but I have a backlog of content
that I was supposed to have blogged. Good news is that I accepted a new
role at Microsoft where maintaining an official blog is part of my job.
J

Thanks,

-Steve

From:
ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks
[MVP]Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 11:45 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin
Tools Pack

okay if you aren't going to blog or KB that .. may someone on
this list?Steve Linehan wrote:
You
can install the Windows Server 2003 SP1 admin pack on Vista RTM, a shim was
added to support this. Once it is installed you will need to register the
DLLs needed for the various snap-ins manually from an elevated command
prompt. Here is a complete list in case you need
them:

regsvr32
/s adprop.dll
regsvr32
/s azroles.dll
regsvr32
/s azroleui.dll
regsvr32
/s ccfg95.dll
regsvr32
/s certadm.dll
regsvr32
/s certmmc.dll
regsvr32
/s certpdef.dll
regsvr32
/s certtmpl.dll
regsvr32
/s certxds.dll
regsvr32
/s cladmwiz.dll
regsvr32
/s clcfgsrv.dll
regsvr32
/s clnetrex.dll
regsvr32
/s cluadmex.dll
regsvr32
/s cluadmmc.dll
regsvr32
/s cmproxy.dll
regsvr32
/s cmroute.dll
regsvr32
/s cmutoa.dll
regsvr32
/s cnet16.dll
regsvr32
/s debugex.dll
regsvr32
/s dfscore.dll
regsvr32
/s dfsgui.dll
regsvr32
/s dhcpsnap.dll
regsvr32
/s dnsmgr.dll
regsvr32
/s domadmin.dll
regsvr32
/s dsadmin.dll
regsvr32
/s dsuiwiz.dll
regsvr32
/s imadmui.dll
regsvr32
/s lrwizdll.dll
regsvr32
/s mprsnap.dll
regsvr32
/s msclus.dll
regsvr32
/s mstsmhst.dll
regsvr32
/s mstsmmc.dll
regsvr32
/s nntpadm.dll
regsvr32
/s nntpapi.dll
regsvr32
/s nntpsnap.dll
regsvr32
/s ntdsbsrv.dll
regsvr32
/s ntfrsapi.dll
regsvr32
/s rasuser.dll
regsvr32
/s rigpsnap.dll
regsvr32
/s rsadmin.dll
regsvr32
/s rscommon.dll
regsvr32
/s rsconn.dll
regsvr32
/s rsengps.dll
regsvr32
/s rsjob.dll
regsvr32
/s rsservps.dll
regsvr32
/s rsshell.dll
regsvr32
/s rssubps.dll
regsvr32
/s rtrfiltr.dll
regsvr32
/s schmmgmt.dll
regsvr32
/s tapisnap.dll
regsvr32
/s tsuserex.dll
regsvr32
/s uddi.mmc.dll
regsvr32
/s vsstskex.dll
regsvr32
/s w95inf16.dll
regsvr32
/s w95inf32.dll
regsvr32
/s winsevnt.dll
regsvr32
/s winsmon.dll
regsvr32
/s winsrpc.dll
regsvr32
/s winssnap.dll
regsvr32
/s ws03res.dll

Thanks,

-Steve

From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of joeSent: Monday, November 20, 2006 9:47
PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject:
RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

>
I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should be quickly on the
way soon for Vista

Errr....
That struck me a little funny... What exactly in the past would make you even
start to assume this. ;o)

History
has taught us exactly the opposite though we have been quite vocal in the
complaints on the lack of left/right hand coordination on this topic.
If we
have something prior to LongHorn RTM I think we will be doing pretty well.
I am an
optimistic cynic - I hope for the best and plan for the worst...

--
O'Reilly
Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of WATSON, BENSent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 8:58
PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject:
[OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack
With the release of Vista to MSDN as well as the Microsoft Licensing site for
download, I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should be quickly on
the way soon for Vista. Anyone have any information on when a Vista
compatible Adminpak will be available?
I would've run Vista Beta 2 full time on my work desktop to test it out, but
with the inability to install the adminpak that severly limited Vista's
usefulness to me.
Thanks,
~Ben
List info :
http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ :
http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
listmailUser is Offline

Posts:824

11/21/2006 5:55 AM  
v\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
o\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
w\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
.shape {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
@font-face {
font-family: Cambria Math;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Calibri;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Tahoma;
}
@page Section1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in; }
P.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
LI.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
A:link {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
A:visited {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
P {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto
}
P.msochpdefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-style-name: msochpdefault
}
LI.msochpdefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-style-name: msochpdefault
}
DIV.msochpdefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-style-name: msochpdefault
}
SPAN.emailstyle17 {
COLOR: windowtext; FONT-FAMILY: "Arial","sans-serif"; mso-style-name: emailstyle17
}
SPAN.emailstyle21 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-name: emailstyle21
}
SPAN.msoins0 {
COLOR: teal; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-name: msoins
}
SPAN.EmailStyle22 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal-reply
}
.MsoChpDefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-style-type: export-only
}
DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}






What hump?
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm


From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of
neil.ruston@uk.nomura.comSent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 10:58
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir]
[OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

You're missing that all important smiley face
:)

Didn't
we all learn that lesson from the 'M$' thread :-^

neil

From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of WATSON,
BENSent: 21 November 2006 15:18To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin
Tools Pack
Hah,
well, the word “assume” as I used it was laced with sarcasm that didn’t exactly
come across the wire.

~Ben

From:
ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of joeSent: Monday, November 20, 2006 7:47
PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir]
[OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

>
I would assume that an Administration Tools
Pack should be quickly on the way soon for Vista

Errr....
That struck me a little funny... What exactly in the past would make you even
start to assume this. ;o)

History
has taught us exactly the opposite though we have been quite vocal in the
complaints on the lack of left/right hand coordination on this topic.
If we
have something prior to LongHorn RTM I think we will be doing pretty well.
I am an
optimistic cynic - I hope for the best and plan for the worst...

--
O'Reilly
Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm



From:
ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of WATSON, BENSent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 8:58
PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [OT] Vista
Admin Tools Pack
With the release of Vista to MSDN as well as the Microsoft Licensing site for
download, I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should be quickly on
the way soon for Vista. Anyone have any information on when a Vista
compatible Adminpak will be available?
I would've run Vista Beta 2 full time on my work desktop to test it out, but
with the inability to install the adminpak that severly limited Vista's
usefulness to me.
Thanks,
~Ben
PLEASE READ: The
information contained in this email is confidential and
intended for the
named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended
recipient of this
email please notify the sender immediately and delete your
copy from your
system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further
action in reliance
on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and
Nomura International
plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent permitted by law,
accept
responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of,

or (b) the presence
of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling
code in, this
message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this
email is sought then
please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated
this email: (1) is
not, and should not be treated or relied upon as,
investment research;
(2) contains views or opinions that are solely those of
the author and do
not necessarily represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended
for informational
purposes only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or
offer to buy or sell
securities or related financial instruments. NIplc
does not provide
investment services to private customers. Authorised and
regulated by the
Financial Services Authority. Registered in England
no. 1550505 VAT No.
447 2492 35. Registered Office: 1 St Martin's-le-Grand,
London, EC1A 4NP. A
member of the Nomura group of companies.
dwellsUser is Offline

Posts:53

11/21/2006 6:48 AM  
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}









Not tried this specifically myself but I’d hazard a guess
that the behavior is per Windows XP in that when you attempt to launch an
additional Explorer.exe process, it merely triggers additional threads under
the existing process context. To rectify, click the checkbox under
Explorer’s View menu “Launch folder Windows in a separate process”
and test again (or trying modifying the machine’s Hosts file using the
elevated explorer by launching Notepad etc).

Deano



--
Dean
Wells
MSEtechnology
* Email: dwells@msetechnology.com
http://msetechnology.com



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Grillenmeier,
Guido
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 2:56 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



Steve – thanks again for sharing this very useful
information. I’ve tested this with different scenarios and I am
somewhat confused as to some of the “great new features” of how
Vista handles the security of new threads when launching applications:

1.
I can install the AdminPak as non-privileged local user and can
fix the DLL registration in an elevated CMD prompt with your tip below –
works fine.

2.
When I install the AdminPak from an elevated CMD prompt right
away, everything also works fine – no need to manually register the DLLs.

3.
When I start the AdminPak installation from an elevated Windows
Explorer window, it does not successfully register the DLLs and
again I have to register the DLLs manually in an elevated prompt to get them to
work

4.
When I right-click the AdminPak installation file in a Windows
Explorer window and choose “Run as administrator” (i.e. running the
install in elevated mode), it’s the same as when launched from an
elevated command prompt and again everything work fine without the need for
manual registration of DLLs.

So what’s different from launching applications from an
elevated Windows Explorer window to launching them from an elevated CMD prompt?

Thanks for any insights J

/Guido



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Steve Linehan
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 5:46 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



You have to run the batch from a command prompt that is elevated
or you will get access denied. To run a cmd prompt elevated search for
cmd.exe from the start menu and right click selecting “Run As
Administrator”. We have also found that if you simply launch the
MSI from an elevated command prompt it will register the DLLs as well.

Thanks,

-Steve



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of WATSON, BEN
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 9:25 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



I found this write up from someone else yesterday, I can’t
remember where now. I tried it immediately and ran into a couple
immediate errors when trying to register these DLLs and the Active Directory
snap-ins still continued to be non-functional. This is using the Win2003
SP1 admin pack on Vista Business RTM. Basically, I threw all those
commands into a text file named register.cmd and let it run.

Certtmpl.dll – Your user account does not have necessary
access rights to register the Certificate Templates snap-in. Log on with
a different user account and try again, or contact your system
administrator. (I am local admin on this Vista box).

Mprsnap.dll – Access is denied. (80070005)

Even those two DLLs don’t seem to be related to the Active
Directory snap-ins, I still get the error that the MMC could not create the
snap-in.

Anyone else run into this?

~Ben



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Steve Linehan
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 10:39 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



KB is in the works, just takes time. Feel free to blog it
or I can if I get some time this week, it is a bit slow this week but I have a
backlog of content that I was supposed to have blogged. Good news is that
I accepted a new role at Microsoft where maintaining an official blog is part
of my job. J

Thanks,

-Steve



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 11:45 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



okay if you aren't going to blog or KB that .. may someone
on this list?

Steve Linehan wrote:

You can install the Windows Server 2003 SP1 admin pack on Vista
RTM, a shim was added to support this. Once it is installed you will need
to register the DLLs needed for the various snap-ins manually from an elevated
command prompt. Here is a complete list in case you need them:

regsvr32 /s adprop.dll

regsvr32 /s azroles.dll

regsvr32 /s azroleui.dll

regsvr32 /s ccfg95.dll

regsvr32 /s certadm.dll

regsvr32 /s certmmc.dll

regsvr32 /s certpdef.dll

regsvr32 /s certtmpl.dll

regsvr32 /s certxds.dll

regsvr32 /s cladmwiz.dll

regsvr32 /s clcfgsrv.dll

regsvr32 /s clnetrex.dll

regsvr32 /s cluadmex.dll

regsvr32 /s cluadmmc.dll

regsvr32 /s cmproxy.dll

regsvr32 /s cmroute.dll

regsvr32 /s cmutoa.dll

regsvr32 /s cnet16.dll

regsvr32 /s debugex.dll

regsvr32 /s dfscore.dll

regsvr32 /s dfsgui.dll

regsvr32 /s dhcpsnap.dll

regsvr32 /s dnsmgr.dll

regsvr32 /s domadmin.dll

regsvr32 /s dsadmin.dll

regsvr32 /s dsuiwiz.dll

regsvr32 /s imadmui.dll

regsvr32 /s lrwizdll.dll

regsvr32 /s mprsnap.dll

regsvr32 /s msclus.dll

regsvr32 /s mstsmhst.dll

regsvr32 /s mstsmmc.dll

regsvr32 /s nntpadm.dll

regsvr32 /s nntpapi.dll

regsvr32 /s nntpsnap.dll

regsvr32 /s ntdsbsrv.dll

regsvr32 /s ntfrsapi.dll

regsvr32 /s rasuser.dll

regsvr32 /s rigpsnap.dll

regsvr32 /s rsadmin.dll

regsvr32 /s rscommon.dll

regsvr32 /s rsconn.dll

regsvr32 /s rsengps.dll

regsvr32 /s rsjob.dll

regsvr32 /s rsservps.dll

regsvr32 /s rsshell.dll

regsvr32 /s rssubps.dll

regsvr32 /s rtrfiltr.dll

regsvr32 /s schmmgmt.dll

regsvr32 /s tapisnap.dll

regsvr32 /s tsuserex.dll

regsvr32 /s uddi.mmc.dll

regsvr32 /s vsstskex.dll

regsvr32 /s w95inf16.dll

regsvr32 /s w95inf32.dll

regsvr32 /s winsevnt.dll

regsvr32 /s winsmon.dll

regsvr32 /s winsrpc.dll

regsvr32 /s winssnap.dll

regsvr32 /s ws03res.dll

Thanks,

-Steve



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 9:47 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



> I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should
be quickly on the way soon for Vista

Errr.... That struck me a little funny... What exactly in the past
would make you even start to assume this. ;o)

History has taught us exactly the opposite though we have been
quite vocal in the complaints on the lack of left/right hand coordination on
this topic.

If we have something prior to LongHorn RTM I think we will be doing
pretty well.

I am an optimistic cynic - I hope for the best and plan for the
worst...



--

O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm

From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of WATSON, BEN
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 8:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

With the release of Vista to MSDN as well as the Microsoft Licensing site for
download, I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should be quickly on
the way soon for Vista. Anyone have any information on when a Vista
compatible Adminpak will be available?

I would've run Vista Beta 2 full time on my work desktop to test it out, but
with the inability to install the adminpak that severly limited Vista's
usefulness to me.

Thanks,

~Ben

List info :
http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ :
http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
listmailUser is Offline

Posts:824

11/21/2006 8:16 AM  
v\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
o\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
w\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
.shape {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
@font-face {
font-family: Wingdings;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Cambria Math;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Calibri;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Tahoma;
}
@page Section1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in; }
P.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
LI.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
A:link {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
A:visited {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
P {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; COLOR: black; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto
}
P.MsoListParagraph {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 34
}
LI.MsoListParagraph {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 34
}
DIV.MsoListParagraph {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 34
}
P.msochpdefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; COLOR: black; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-style-name: msochpdefault
}
LI.msochpdefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; COLOR: black; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-style-name: msochpdefault
}
DIV.msochpdefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; COLOR: black; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-style-name: msochpdefault
}
SPAN.emailstyle17 {
COLOR: windowtext; FONT-FAMILY: "Arial","sans-serif"; mso-style-name: emailstyle17
}
SPAN.emailstyle21 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-name: emailstyle21
}
SPAN.msoins0 {
COLOR: teal; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-name: msoins
}
SPAN.EmailStyle22 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal
}
SPAN.EmailStyle23 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal
}
SPAN.EmailStyle24 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal
}
SPAN.EmailStyle25 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal
}
SPAN.EmailStyle26 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal-reply
}
.MsoChpDefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-style-type: export-only
}
DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}
OL {
MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0in
}
UL {
MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0in
}






Wow the list is flying today... Took an hour and a half to
get the message back to myself.
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm


From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of
joeSent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 5:50 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin
Tools Pack

The Vista source isn't available for perusal yet so this is
a complete guess but I expect it is something likeExplorer purposely
"dumbs down"the process token used tolaunch thenew process.
Its just a guess though...

--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm


From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Grillenmeier,
GuidoSent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 2:56 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin
Tools Pack
Steve
– thanks again for sharing this very useful information. I’ve tested this
with different scenarios and I am somewhat confused as to some of the “great new
features” of how Vista handles the security of new threads when launching
applications:

1.
I
can install the AdminPak as non-privileged local user and can fix the DLL
registration in an elevated CMD prompt with your tip below – works
fine.
2.
When
I install the AdminPak from an elevated CMD prompt right away, everything also
works fine – no need to manually register the DLLs.
3.
When
I start the AdminPak installation from an elevated Windows Explorer
window, it does not successfully register the DLLs and again I have to
register the DLLs manually in an elevated prompt to get them to
work
4.
When
I right-click the AdminPak installation file in a Windows Explorer window and
choose “Run as administrator” (i.e. running the install in elevated mode), it’s
the same as when launched from an elevated command prompt and again everything
work fine without the need for manual registration of
DLLs.

So
what’s different from launching applications from an elevated Windows Explorer
window to launching them from an elevated CMD prompt?

Thanks
for any insights J

/Guido

From:
ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of Steve LinehanSent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006
5:46 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE:
[ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

You
have to run the batch from a command prompt that is elevated or you will get
access denied. To run a cmd prompt elevated search for cmd.exe from the
start menu and right click selecting “Run As Administrator”. We have also
found that if you simply launch the MSI from an elevated command prompt it will
register the DLLs as well.

Thanks,

-Steve

From:
ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of WATSON, BENSent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 9:25
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir]
[OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

I
found this write up from someone else yesterday, I can’t remember where
now. I tried it immediately and ran into a couple immediate errors when
trying to register these DLLs and the Active Directory snap-ins still continued
to be non-functional. This is using the Win2003 SP1 admin pack on Vista
Business RTM. Basically, I threw all those commands into a text file named
register.cmd and let it run.

Certtmpl.dll
– Your user account does not have necessary access rights to register the
Certificate Templates snap-in. Log on with a different user account and
try again, or contact your system administrator. (I am local admin on this
Vista box).

Mprsnap.dll
– Access is denied. (80070005)

Even
those two DLLs don’t seem to be related to the Active Directory snap-ins, I
still get the error that the MMC could not create the
snap-in.

Anyone
else run into this?

~Ben

From:
ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of Steve LinehanSent: Monday, November 20, 2006
10:39 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE:
[ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

KB
is in the works, just takes time. Feel free to blog it or I can if I get
some time this week, it is a bit slow this week but I have a backlog of content
that I was supposed to have blogged. Good news is that I accepted a new
role at Microsoft where maintaining an official blog is part of my job.
J

Thanks,

-Steve

From:
ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks
[MVP]Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 11:45 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin
Tools Pack

okay if you aren't going to blog or KB that .. may someone on
this list?Steve Linehan wrote:
You
can install the Windows Server 2003 SP1 admin pack on Vista RTM, a shim was
added to support this. Once it is installed you will need to register the
DLLs needed for the various snap-ins manually from an elevated command
prompt. Here is a complete list in case you need
them:

regsvr32
/s adprop.dll
regsvr32
/s azroles.dll
regsvr32
/s azroleui.dll
regsvr32
/s ccfg95.dll
regsvr32
/s certadm.dll
regsvr32
/s certmmc.dll
regsvr32
/s certpdef.dll
regsvr32
/s certtmpl.dll
regsvr32
/s certxds.dll
regsvr32
/s cladmwiz.dll
regsvr32
/s clcfgsrv.dll
regsvr32
/s clnetrex.dll
regsvr32
/s cluadmex.dll
regsvr32
/s cluadmmc.dll
regsvr32
/s cmproxy.dll
regsvr32
/s cmroute.dll
regsvr32
/s cmutoa.dll
regsvr32
/s cnet16.dll
regsvr32
/s debugex.dll
regsvr32
/s dfscore.dll
regsvr32
/s dfsgui.dll
regsvr32
/s dhcpsnap.dll
regsvr32
/s dnsmgr.dll
regsvr32
/s domadmin.dll
regsvr32
/s dsadmin.dll
regsvr32
/s dsuiwiz.dll
regsvr32
/s imadmui.dll
regsvr32
/s lrwizdll.dll
regsvr32
/s mprsnap.dll
regsvr32
/s msclus.dll
regsvr32
/s mstsmhst.dll
regsvr32
/s mstsmmc.dll
regsvr32
/s nntpadm.dll
regsvr32
/s nntpapi.dll
regsvr32
/s nntpsnap.dll
regsvr32
/s ntdsbsrv.dll
regsvr32
/s ntfrsapi.dll
regsvr32
/s rasuser.dll
regsvr32
/s rigpsnap.dll
regsvr32
/s rsadmin.dll
regsvr32
/s rscommon.dll
regsvr32
/s rsconn.dll
regsvr32
/s rsengps.dll
regsvr32
/s rsjob.dll
regsvr32
/s rsservps.dll
regsvr32
/s rsshell.dll
regsvr32
/s rssubps.dll
regsvr32
/s rtrfiltr.dll
regsvr32
/s schmmgmt.dll
regsvr32
/s tapisnap.dll
regsvr32
/s tsuserex.dll
regsvr32
/s uddi.mmc.dll
regsvr32
/s vsstskex.dll
regsvr32
/s w95inf16.dll
regsvr32
/s w95inf32.dll
regsvr32
/s winsevnt.dll
regsvr32
/s winsmon.dll
regsvr32
/s winsrpc.dll
regsvr32
/s winssnap.dll
regsvr32
/s ws03res.dll

Thanks,

-Steve

From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of joeSent: Monday, November 20, 2006 9:47
PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject:
RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

>
I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should be quickly on the
way soon for Vista

Errr....
That struck me a little funny... What exactly in the past would make you even
start to assume this. ;o)

History
has taught us exactly the opposite though we have been quite vocal in the
complaints on the lack of left/right hand coordination on this topic.
If we
have something prior to LongHorn RTM I think we will be doing pretty well.
I am an
optimistic cynic - I hope for the best and plan for the worst...

--
O'Reilly
Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of WATSON, BENSent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 8:58
PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject:
[OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack
With the release of Vista to MSDN as well as the Microsoft Licensing site for
download, I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should be quickly on
the way soon for Vista. Anyone have any information on when a Vista
compatible Adminpak will be available?
I would've run Vista Beta 2 full time on my work desktop to test it out, but
with the inability to install the adminpak that severly limited Vista's
usefulness to me.
Thanks,
~Ben
List info :
http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ :
http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
AD000001799User is Offline

Posts:0

11/21/2006 10:18 AM  
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}









Hah, well, the word “assume” as I used it was laced
with sarcasm that didn’t exactly come across the wire.

~Ben



From:
ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On
Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 7:47 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



> I would assume that an
Administration Tools Pack should be quickly on the way soon for Vista

Errr.... That struck me a little funny... What exactly in the past
would make you even start to assume this. ;o)

History has taught us exactly the opposite though we have been
quite vocal in the complaints on the lack of left/right hand coordination on
this topic.

If we have something prior to LongHorn RTM I think we will be doing
pretty well.

I am an optimistic cynic - I hope for the best and plan for the
worst...



--

O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm

From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of WATSON, BEN
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 8:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

With the release of Vista to MSDN as well as the Microsoft Licensing site
for download, I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should be
quickly on the way soon for Vista. Anyone have any information on when a
Vista compatible Adminpak will be available?

I would've run Vista Beta 2 full time on my work desktop to test it out, but
with the inability to install the adminpak that severly limited Vista's
usefulness to me.

Thanks,

~Ben
AD000001799User is Offline

Posts:0

11/21/2006 10:25 AM  
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}









I found this write up from someone else yesterday, I can’t
remember where now. I tried it immediately and ran into a couple immediate
errors when trying to register these DLLs and the Active Directory snap-ins
still continued to be non-functional. This is using the Win2003 SP1 admin pack
on Vista Business RTM. Basically, I threw all those commands into a text file
named register.cmd and let it run.

Certtmpl.dll – Your user account does not have necessary access
rights to register the Certificate Templates snap-in. Log on with a different
user account and try again, or contact your system administrator. (I am local
admin on this Vista box).

Mprsnap.dll – Access is denied. (80070005)

Even those two DLLs don’t seem to be related to the Active
Directory snap-ins, I still get the error that the MMC could not create the
snap-in.

Anyone else run into this?

~Ben



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Steve Linehan
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 10:39 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



KB is in the works, just takes time. Feel free to blog it
or I can if I get some time this week, it is a bit slow this week but I have a
backlog of content that I was supposed to have blogged. Good news is that
I accepted a new role at Microsoft where maintaining an official blog is part
of my job. J

Thanks,

-Steve



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 11:45 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



okay if you aren't going to blog or KB that .. may someone
on this list?

Steve Linehan wrote:

You can install the Windows Server 2003 SP1 admin pack on Vista
RTM, a shim was added to support this. Once it is installed you will need
to register the DLLs needed for the various snap-ins manually from an elevated
command prompt. Here is a complete list in case you need them:

regsvr32 /s adprop.dll

regsvr32 /s azroles.dll

regsvr32 /s azroleui.dll

regsvr32 /s ccfg95.dll

regsvr32 /s certadm.dll

regsvr32 /s certmmc.dll

regsvr32 /s certpdef.dll

regsvr32 /s certtmpl.dll

regsvr32 /s certxds.dll

regsvr32 /s cladmwiz.dll

regsvr32 /s clcfgsrv.dll

regsvr32 /s clnetrex.dll

regsvr32 /s cluadmex.dll

regsvr32 /s cluadmmc.dll

regsvr32 /s cmproxy.dll

regsvr32 /s cmroute.dll

regsvr32 /s cmutoa.dll

regsvr32 /s cnet16.dll

regsvr32 /s debugex.dll

regsvr32 /s dfscore.dll

regsvr32 /s dfsgui.dll

regsvr32 /s dhcpsnap.dll

regsvr32 /s dnsmgr.dll

regsvr32 /s domadmin.dll

regsvr32 /s dsadmin.dll

regsvr32 /s dsuiwiz.dll

regsvr32 /s imadmui.dll

regsvr32 /s lrwizdll.dll

regsvr32 /s mprsnap.dll

regsvr32 /s msclus.dll

regsvr32 /s mstsmhst.dll

regsvr32 /s mstsmmc.dll

regsvr32 /s nntpadm.dll

regsvr32 /s nntpapi.dll

regsvr32 /s nntpsnap.dll

regsvr32 /s ntdsbsrv.dll

regsvr32 /s ntfrsapi.dll

regsvr32 /s rasuser.dll

regsvr32 /s rigpsnap.dll

regsvr32 /s rsadmin.dll

regsvr32 /s rscommon.dll

regsvr32 /s rsconn.dll

regsvr32 /s rsengps.dll

regsvr32 /s rsjob.dll

regsvr32 /s rsservps.dll

regsvr32 /s rsshell.dll

regsvr32 /s rssubps.dll

regsvr32 /s rtrfiltr.dll

regsvr32 /s schmmgmt.dll

regsvr32 /s tapisnap.dll

regsvr32 /s tsuserex.dll

regsvr32 /s uddi.mmc.dll

regsvr32 /s vsstskex.dll

regsvr32 /s w95inf16.dll

regsvr32 /s w95inf32.dll

regsvr32 /s winsevnt.dll

regsvr32 /s winsmon.dll

regsvr32 /s winsrpc.dll

regsvr32 /s winssnap.dll

regsvr32 /s ws03res.dll

Thanks,

-Steve



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 9:47 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



> I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should
be quickly on the way soon for Vista

Errr.... That struck me a little funny... What exactly in the past
would make you even start to assume this. ;o)

History has taught us exactly the opposite though we have been
quite vocal in the complaints on the lack of left/right hand coordination on
this topic.

If we have something prior to LongHorn RTM I think we will be doing
pretty well.

I am an optimistic cynic - I hope for the best and plan for the
worst...



--

O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm

From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of WATSON, BEN
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 8:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

With the release of Vista to MSDN as well as the Microsoft Licensing site
for download, I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should be
quickly on the way soon for Vista. Anyone have any information on when a
Vista compatible Adminpak will be available?

I would've run Vista Beta 2 full time on my work desktop to test it out, but
with the inability to install the adminpak that severly limited Vista's
usefulness to me.

Thanks,

~Ben

List info :
http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ :
http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
listmailUser is Offline

Posts:824

11/21/2006 10:48 AM  
v\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
o\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
w\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
.shape {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
@font-face {
font-family: Wingdings;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Cambria Math;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Calibri;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Tahoma;
}
@page Section1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in; }
P.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
LI.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
A:link {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
A:visited {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
P {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; COLOR: black; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto
}
P.msochpdefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; COLOR: black; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-style-name: msochpdefault
}
LI.msochpdefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; COLOR: black; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-style-name: msochpdefault
}
DIV.msochpdefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; COLOR: black; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-style-name: msochpdefault
}
SPAN.emailstyle17 {
COLOR: windowtext; FONT-FAMILY: "Arial","sans-serif"; mso-style-name: emailstyle17
}
SPAN.emailstyle21 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-name: emailstyle21
}
SPAN.msoins0 {
COLOR: teal; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-name: msoins
}
SPAN.EmailStyle22 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal
}
SPAN.EmailStyle23 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal-reply
}
.MsoChpDefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-style-type: export-only
}
DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}






Excellent thanks for the info Steve, and congrats on the
new position.

joe
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm


From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Steve
LinehanSent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 1:39 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin
Tools Pack
KB
is in the works, just takes time. Feel free to blog it or I can if I get
some time this week, it is a bit slow this week but I have a backlog of content
that I was supposed to have blogged. Good news is that I accepted a new
role at Microsoft where maintaining an official blog is part of my job.
J

Thanks,

-Steve

From:
ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks
[MVP]Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 11:45 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin
Tools Pack

okay if you aren't going to blog or KB that .. may someone on
this list?Steve Linehan wrote:
You
can install the Windows Server 2003 SP1 admin pack on Vista RTM, a shim was
added to support this. Once it is installed you will need to register the
DLLs needed for the various snap-ins manually from an elevated command
prompt. Here is a complete list in case you need
them:

regsvr32
/s adprop.dll
regsvr32
/s azroles.dll
regsvr32
/s azroleui.dll
regsvr32
/s ccfg95.dll
regsvr32
/s certadm.dll
regsvr32
/s certmmc.dll
regsvr32
/s certpdef.dll
regsvr32
/s certtmpl.dll
regsvr32
/s certxds.dll
regsvr32
/s cladmwiz.dll
regsvr32
/s clcfgsrv.dll
regsvr32
/s clnetrex.dll
regsvr32
/s cluadmex.dll
regsvr32
/s cluadmmc.dll
regsvr32
/s cmproxy.dll
regsvr32
/s cmroute.dll
regsvr32
/s cmutoa.dll
regsvr32
/s cnet16.dll
regsvr32
/s debugex.dll
regsvr32
/s dfscore.dll
regsvr32
/s dfsgui.dll
regsvr32
/s dhcpsnap.dll
regsvr32
/s dnsmgr.dll
regsvr32
/s domadmin.dll
regsvr32
/s dsadmin.dll
regsvr32
/s dsuiwiz.dll
regsvr32
/s imadmui.dll
regsvr32
/s lrwizdll.dll
regsvr32
/s mprsnap.dll
regsvr32
/s msclus.dll
regsvr32
/s mstsmhst.dll
regsvr32
/s mstsmmc.dll
regsvr32
/s nntpadm.dll
regsvr32
/s nntpapi.dll
regsvr32
/s nntpsnap.dll
regsvr32
/s ntdsbsrv.dll
regsvr32
/s ntfrsapi.dll
regsvr32
/s rasuser.dll
regsvr32
/s rigpsnap.dll
regsvr32
/s rsadmin.dll
regsvr32
/s rscommon.dll
regsvr32
/s rsconn.dll
regsvr32
/s rsengps.dll
regsvr32
/s rsjob.dll
regsvr32
/s rsservps.dll
regsvr32
/s rsshell.dll
regsvr32
/s rssubps.dll
regsvr32
/s rtrfiltr.dll
regsvr32
/s schmmgmt.dll
regsvr32
/s tapisnap.dll
regsvr32
/s tsuserex.dll
regsvr32
/s uddi.mmc.dll
regsvr32
/s vsstskex.dll
regsvr32
/s w95inf16.dll
regsvr32
/s w95inf32.dll
regsvr32
/s winsevnt.dll
regsvr32
/s winsmon.dll
regsvr32
/s winsrpc.dll
regsvr32
/s winssnap.dll
regsvr32
/s ws03res.dll

Thanks,

-Steve

From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of joeSent: Monday, November 20, 2006 9:47
PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject:
RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

>
I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should be quickly on the
way soon for Vista

Errr....
That struck me a little funny... What exactly in the past would make you even
start to assume this. ;o)

History
has taught us exactly the opposite though we have been quite vocal in the
complaints on the lack of left/right hand coordination on this topic.
If we
have something prior to LongHorn RTM I think we will be doing pretty well.
I am an
optimistic cynic - I hope for the best and plan for the worst...

--
O'Reilly
Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of WATSON, BENSent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 8:58
PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject:
[OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack
With the release of Vista to MSDN as well as the Microsoft Licensing site for
download, I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should be quickly on
the way soon for Vista. Anyone have any information on when a Vista
compatible Adminpak will be available?
I would've run Vista Beta 2 full time on my work desktop to test it out, but
with the inability to install the adminpak that severly limited Vista's
usefulness to me.
Thanks,
~Ben
List info :
http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ :
http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
AD000001290User is Offline

Posts:0

11/21/2006 10:57 AM  
v\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
o\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
w\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
.shape {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
@font-face {
font-family: Cambria Math;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Calibri;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Tahoma;
}
@page Section1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in; }
P.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
LI.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
A:link {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
A:visited {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
P {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto
}
P.msochpdefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-style-name: msochpdefault
}
LI.msochpdefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-style-name: msochpdefault
}
DIV.msochpdefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-style-name: msochpdefault
}
SPAN.emailstyle17 {
COLOR: windowtext; FONT-FAMILY: "Arial","sans-serif"; mso-style-name: emailstyle17
}
SPAN.emailstyle21 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-name: emailstyle21
}
SPAN.msoins0 {
COLOR: teal; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-name: msoins
}
SPAN.EmailStyle22 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal-reply
}
.MsoChpDefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-style-type: export-only
}
DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}






You're missing that all important smiley face
:)

Didn't
we all learn that lesson from the 'M$' thread :-^

neil

From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of WATSON,
BENSent: 21 November 2006 15:18To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin
Tools Pack
Hah,
well, the word “assume” as I used it was laced with sarcasm that didn’t exactly
come across the wire.

~Ben

From:
ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of joeSent: Monday, November 20, 2006 7:47
PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir]
[OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

>
I would assume that an Administration Tools
Pack should be quickly on the way soon for Vista

Errr....
That struck me a little funny... What exactly in the past would make you even
start to assume this. ;o)

History
has taught us exactly the opposite though we have been quite vocal in the
complaints on the lack of left/right hand coordination on this topic.
If we
have something prior to LongHorn RTM I think we will be doing pretty well.
I am an
optimistic cynic - I hope for the best and plan for the worst...

--
O'Reilly
Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm



From:
ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of WATSON, BENSent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 8:58
PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [OT] Vista
Admin Tools Pack
With the release of Vista to MSDN as well as the Microsoft Licensing site for
download, I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should be quickly on
the way soon for Vista. Anyone have any information on when a Vista
compatible Adminpak will be available?
I would've run Vista Beta 2 full time on my work desktop to test it out, but
with the inability to install the adminpak that severly limited Vista's
usefulness to me.
Thanks,
~BenPLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confidential and

intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended

recipient of this email please notify the sender immediately and delete your

copy from your system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further

action in reliance on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and

Nomura International plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent permitted by law,

accept responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of,

or (b) the presence of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling

code in, this message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this

email is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated

this email: (1) is not, and should not be treated or relied upon as,

investment research; (2) contains views or opinions that are solely those of

the author and do not necessarily represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended

for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or

offer to buy or sell securities or related financial instruments. NIplc

does not provide investment services to private customers. Authorised and

regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registered in England

no. 1550505 VAT No. 447 2492 35. Registered Office: 1 St Martin's-le-Grand,

London, EC1A 4NP. A member of the Nomura group of companies.
AD000001410User is Offline

Posts:0

11/21/2006 11:15 AM  
Make sure you run the .cmd file, or
cmd.exe as Administrator (right click on it, Run as Administrator). I
did still get a few errors on some DLLs, but I assumed that they were DLLs
that didn't need to be registered. My ADUC console works fine now.


"WATSON, BEN"

Sent by: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
11/21/2006 10:25 AM

Please respond to
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org

To

cc

Subject
RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista
Admin Tools Pack
I found this write up from
someone else yesterday, I can’t remember where now. I tried it immediately
and ran into a couple immediate errors when trying to register these DLLs
and the Active Directory snap-ins still continued to be non-functional.
This is using the Win2003 SP1 admin pack on Vista Business RTM. Basically,
I threw all those commands into a text file named register.cmd and let
it run.

Certtmpl.dll – Your user
account does not have necessary access rights to register the Certificate
Templates snap-in. Log on with a different user account and try again,
or contact your system administrator. (I am local admin on this Vista
box).

Mprsnap.dll – Access is
denied. (80070005)

Even those two DLLs don’t
seem to be related to the Active Directory snap-ins, I still get the error
that the MMC could not create the snap-in.

Anyone else run into this?

~Ben

From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Steve Linehan
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 10:39 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

KB is in the works, just
takes time. Feel free to blog it or I can if I get some time this
week, it is a bit slow this week but I have a backlog of content that I
was supposed to have blogged. Good news is that I accepted a new
role at Microsoft where maintaining an official blog is part of my job.
J

Thanks,

-Steve

From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 11:45 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

okay if you aren't going to blog
or KB that .. may someone on this list?

Steve Linehan wrote:
You can install the Windows
Server 2003 SP1 admin pack on Vista RTM, a shim was added to support this.
Once it is installed you will need to register the DLLs needed for
the various snap-ins manually from an elevated command prompt. Here
is a complete list in case you need them:

regsvr32 /s adprop.dll
regsvr32 /s azroles.dll
regsvr32 /s azroleui.dll
regsvr32 /s ccfg95.dll
regsvr32 /s certadm.dll
regsvr32 /s certmmc.dll
regsvr32 /s certpdef.dll
regsvr32 /s certtmpl.dll
regsvr32 /s certxds.dll
regsvr32 /s cladmwiz.dll
regsvr32 /s clcfgsrv.dll
regsvr32 /s clnetrex.dll
regsvr32 /s cluadmex.dll
regsvr32 /s cluadmmc.dll
regsvr32 /s cmproxy.dll
regsvr32 /s cmroute.dll
regsvr32 /s cmutoa.dll
regsvr32 /s cnet16.dll
regsvr32 /s debugex.dll
regsvr32 /s dfscore.dll
regsvr32 /s dfsgui.dll
regsvr32 /s dhcpsnap.dll
regsvr32 /s dnsmgr.dll
regsvr32 /s domadmin.dll
regsvr32 /s dsadmin.dll
regsvr32 /s dsuiwiz.dll
regsvr32 /s imadmui.dll
regsvr32 /s lrwizdll.dll
regsvr32 /s mprsnap.dll
regsvr32 /s msclus.dll
regsvr32 /s mstsmhst.dll
regsvr32 /s mstsmmc.dll
regsvr32 /s nntpadm.dll
regsvr32 /s nntpapi.dll
regsvr32 /s nntpsnap.dll
regsvr32 /s ntdsbsrv.dll
regsvr32 /s ntfrsapi.dll
regsvr32 /s rasuser.dll
regsvr32 /s rigpsnap.dll
regsvr32 /s rsadmin.dll
regsvr32 /s rscommon.dll
regsvr32 /s rsconn.dll
regsvr32 /s rsengps.dll
regsvr32 /s rsjob.dll
regsvr32 /s rsservps.dll
regsvr32 /s rsshell.dll
regsvr32 /s rssubps.dll
regsvr32 /s rtrfiltr.dll
regsvr32 /s schmmgmt.dll
regsvr32 /s tapisnap.dll
regsvr32 /s tsuserex.dll
regsvr32 /s uddi.mmc.dll
regsvr32 /s vsstskex.dll
regsvr32 /s w95inf16.dll
regsvr32 /s w95inf32.dll
regsvr32 /s winsevnt.dll
regsvr32 /s winsmon.dll
regsvr32 /s winsrpc.dll
regsvr32 /s winssnap.dll
regsvr32 /s ws03res.dll

Thanks,

-Steve

From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 9:47 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

> I
would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should be quickly on the
way soon for Vista

Errr.... That struck me a little
funny... What exactly in the past would make you even start to assume this.
;o)

History has taught us exactly
the opposite though we have been quite vocal in the complaints on the lack
of left/right hand coordination on this topic.

If we have something prior to
LongHorn RTM I think we will be doing pretty well.

I am an optimistic cynic - I hope
for the best and plan for the worst...

--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third
Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of WATSON, BEN
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 8:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack
With the release of Vista to MSDN
as well as the Microsoft Licensing site for download, I would assume that
an Administration Tools Pack should be quickly on the way soon for Vista.
Anyone have any information on when a Vista compatible Adminpak will
be available?
I would've run Vista Beta 2 full
time on my work desktop to test it out, but with the inability to install
the adminpak that severly limited Vista's usefulness to me.
Thanks,
~Ben
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
**********************************************************
Privileged and/or confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or are not responsible for delivery of this message to that person) , you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and notify the sender by reply e-mail.
If you or your employer do not consent to Internet e-mail for messages of this kind, please advise the sender.
Shaw Industries does not provide or endorse any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of the company or its subsidiaries.
**********************************************************
slinehanUser is Offline

Posts:18

11/21/2006 11:45 AM  
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}









You have to run the batch from a command prompt that is elevated
or you will get access denied. To run a cmd prompt elevated search for
cmd.exe from the start menu and right click selecting “Run As
Administrator”. We have also found that if you simply launch the
MSI from an elevated command prompt it will register the DLLs as well.

Thanks,

-Steve



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of WATSON, BEN
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 9:25 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



I found this write up from someone else yesterday, I can’t
remember where now. I tried it immediately and ran into a couple
immediate errors when trying to register these DLLs and the Active Directory
snap-ins still continued to be non-functional. This is using the Win2003
SP1 admin pack on Vista Business RTM. Basically, I threw all those
commands into a text file named register.cmd and let it run.

Certtmpl.dll – Your user account does not have necessary
access rights to register the Certificate Templates snap-in. Log on with
a different user account and try again, or contact your system
administrator. (I am local admin on this Vista box).

Mprsnap.dll – Access is denied. (80070005)

Even those two DLLs don’t seem to be related to the Active
Directory snap-ins, I still get the error that the MMC could not create the
snap-in.

Anyone else run into this?

~Ben



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Steve Linehan
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 10:39 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



KB is in the works, just takes time. Feel free to blog it
or I can if I get some time this week, it is a bit slow this week but I have a
backlog of content that I was supposed to have blogged. Good news is that
I accepted a new role at Microsoft where maintaining an official blog is part
of my job. J

Thanks,

-Steve



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 11:45 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



okay if you aren't going to blog or KB that .. may someone
on this list?

Steve Linehan wrote:

You can install the Windows Server 2003 SP1 admin pack on Vista
RTM, a shim was added to support this. Once it is installed you will need
to register the DLLs needed for the various snap-ins manually from an elevated
command prompt. Here is a complete list in case you need them:

regsvr32 /s adprop.dll

regsvr32 /s azroles.dll

regsvr32 /s azroleui.dll

regsvr32 /s ccfg95.dll

regsvr32 /s certadm.dll

regsvr32 /s certmmc.dll

regsvr32 /s certpdef.dll

regsvr32 /s certtmpl.dll

regsvr32 /s certxds.dll

regsvr32 /s cladmwiz.dll

regsvr32 /s clcfgsrv.dll

regsvr32 /s clnetrex.dll

regsvr32 /s cluadmex.dll

regsvr32 /s cluadmmc.dll

regsvr32 /s cmproxy.dll

regsvr32 /s cmroute.dll

regsvr32 /s cmutoa.dll

regsvr32 /s cnet16.dll

regsvr32 /s debugex.dll

regsvr32 /s dfscore.dll

regsvr32 /s dfsgui.dll

regsvr32 /s dhcpsnap.dll

regsvr32 /s dnsmgr.dll

regsvr32 /s domadmin.dll

regsvr32 /s dsadmin.dll

regsvr32 /s dsuiwiz.dll

regsvr32 /s imadmui.dll

regsvr32 /s lrwizdll.dll

regsvr32 /s mprsnap.dll

regsvr32 /s msclus.dll

regsvr32 /s mstsmhst.dll

regsvr32 /s mstsmmc.dll

regsvr32 /s nntpadm.dll

regsvr32 /s nntpapi.dll

regsvr32 /s nntpsnap.dll

regsvr32 /s ntdsbsrv.dll

regsvr32 /s ntfrsapi.dll

regsvr32 /s rasuser.dll

regsvr32 /s rigpsnap.dll

regsvr32 /s rsadmin.dll

regsvr32 /s rscommon.dll

regsvr32 /s rsconn.dll

regsvr32 /s rsengps.dll

regsvr32 /s rsjob.dll

regsvr32 /s rsservps.dll

regsvr32 /s rsshell.dll

regsvr32 /s rssubps.dll

regsvr32 /s rtrfiltr.dll

regsvr32 /s schmmgmt.dll

regsvr32 /s tapisnap.dll

regsvr32 /s tsuserex.dll

regsvr32 /s uddi.mmc.dll

regsvr32 /s vsstskex.dll

regsvr32 /s w95inf16.dll

regsvr32 /s w95inf32.dll

regsvr32 /s winsevnt.dll

regsvr32 /s winsmon.dll

regsvr32 /s winsrpc.dll

regsvr32 /s winssnap.dll

regsvr32 /s ws03res.dll

Thanks,

-Steve



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 9:47 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



> I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should
be quickly on the way soon for Vista

Errr.... That struck me a little funny... What exactly in the past
would make you even start to assume this. ;o)

History has taught us exactly the opposite though we have been
quite vocal in the complaints on the lack of left/right hand coordination on
this topic.

If we have something prior to LongHorn RTM I think we will be doing
pretty well.

I am an optimistic cynic - I hope for the best and plan for the
worst...



--

O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm

From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of WATSON, BEN
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 8:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

With the release of Vista to MSDN as well as the Microsoft Licensing site
for download, I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should be
quickly on the way soon for Vista. Anyone have any information on when a
Vista compatible Adminpak will be available?

I would've run Vista Beta 2 full time on my work desktop to test it out, but
with the inability to install the adminpak that severly limited Vista's
usefulness to me.

Thanks,

~Ben

List info :
http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ :
http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
AD000001799User is Offline

Posts:0

11/21/2006 12:36 PM  
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}









Whoops! :D



From:
ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On
Behalf Of neil.ruston@uk.nomura.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 7:58 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



You're missing that all important smiley face :)

Didn't we all learn that lesson from the 'M$' thread :-^

neil

From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of WATSON, BEN
Sent: 21 November 2006 15:18
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

Hah, well, the word “assume” as I used it was laced with sarcasm
that didn’t exactly come across the wire.

~Ben



From:
ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On
Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 7:47 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



> I would assume that an
Administration Tools Pack should be quickly on the way soon for Vista

Errr.... That struck me a little funny... What exactly in the past
would make you even start to assume this. ;o)

History has taught us exactly the opposite though we have been
quite vocal in the complaints on the lack of left/right hand coordination on
this topic.

If we have something prior to LongHorn RTM I think we will be doing
pretty well.

I am an optimistic cynic - I hope for the best and plan for the
worst...



--

O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm

From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of WATSON, BEN
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 8:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

With the release of Vista to MSDN as well as the Microsoft Licensing site
for download, I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should be
quickly on the way soon for Vista. Anyone have any information on when a
Vista compatible Adminpak will be available?

I would've run Vista Beta 2 full time on my work desktop to test it out, but
with the inability to install the adminpak that severly limited Vista's
usefulness to me.

Thanks,

~Ben

PLEASE
READ: The information contained in this email is confidential and

intended
for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended

recipient
of this email please notify the sender immediately and delete your

copy
from your system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further

action
in reliance on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and

Nomura
International plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent permitted by law,

accept
responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of,

or
(b) the presence of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling

code
in, this message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this

email
is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated

this
email: (1) is not, and should not be treated or relied upon as,

investment
research; (2) contains views or opinions that are solely those of

the
author and do not necessarily represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended

for
informational purposes only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or

offer
to buy or sell securities or related financial instruments. NIplc

does
not provide investment services to private customers. Authorised and

regulated
by the Financial Services Authority. Registered in England

no.
1550505 VAT No. 447 2492 35. Registered Office: 1 St Martin's-le-Grand,

London,
EC1A 4NP. A member of the Nomura group of companies.
sbradcpaUser is Offline

Posts:496

11/21/2006 12:44 PM  
okay if you aren't going to blog or KB that .. may someone on this list?

Steve Linehan wrote:



v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}









You
can install the Windows Server 2003 SP1 admin pack on Vista
RTM, a shim was added to support this. Once it is installed you will
need
to register the DLLs needed for the various snap-ins manually from an
elevated
command prompt. Here is a complete list in case you need them:

regsvr32
/s adprop.dll
regsvr32
/s azroles.dll
regsvr32
/s azroleui.dll
regsvr32
/s ccfg95.dll
regsvr32
/s certadm.dll
regsvr32
/s certmmc.dll
regsvr32
/s certpdef.dll
regsvr32
/s certtmpl.dll
regsvr32
/s certxds.dll
regsvr32
/s cladmwiz.dll
regsvr32
/s clcfgsrv.dll
regsvr32
/s clnetrex.dll
regsvr32
/s cluadmex.dll
regsvr32
/s cluadmmc.dll
regsvr32
/s cmproxy.dll
regsvr32
/s cmroute.dll
regsvr32
/s cmutoa.dll
regsvr32
/s cnet16.dll
regsvr32
/s debugex.dll
regsvr32
/s dfscore.dll
regsvr32
/s dfsgui.dll
regsvr32
/s dhcpsnap.dll
regsvr32
/s dnsmgr.dll
regsvr32
/s domadmin.dll
regsvr32
/s dsadmin.dll
regsvr32
/s dsuiwiz.dll
regsvr32
/s imadmui.dll
regsvr32
/s lrwizdll.dll
regsvr32
/s mprsnap.dll
regsvr32
/s msclus.dll
regsvr32
/s mstsmhst.dll
regsvr32
/s mstsmmc.dll
regsvr32
/s nntpadm.dll
regsvr32
/s nntpapi.dll
regsvr32
/s nntpsnap.dll
regsvr32
/s ntdsbsrv.dll
regsvr32
/s ntfrsapi.dll
regsvr32
/s rasuser.dll
regsvr32
/s rigpsnap.dll
regsvr32
/s rsadmin.dll
regsvr32
/s rscommon.dll
regsvr32
/s rsconn.dll
regsvr32
/s rsengps.dll
regsvr32
/s rsjob.dll
regsvr32
/s rsservps.dll
regsvr32
/s rsshell.dll
regsvr32
/s rssubps.dll
regsvr32
/s rtrfiltr.dll
regsvr32
/s schmmgmt.dll
regsvr32
/s tapisnap.dll
regsvr32
/s tsuserex.dll
regsvr32
/s uddi.mmc.dll
regsvr32
/s vsstskex.dll
regsvr32
/s w95inf16.dll
regsvr32
/s w95inf32.dll
regsvr32
/s winsevnt.dll
regsvr32
/s winsmon.dll
regsvr32
/s winsrpc.dll
regsvr32
/s winssnap.dll
regsvr32
/s ws03res.dll

Thanks,

-Steve



From:
ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On
Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 9:47 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



>
I would assume that an
Administration Tools Pack should be quickly on the way soon for Vista

Errr....
That struck me a little funny... What exactly in the past
would make you even start to assume this. ;o)

History
has taught us exactly the opposite though we have been
quite vocal in the complaints on the lack of left/right hand
coordination on this
topic.

If
we have something prior to LongHorn RTM I think we will be doing
pretty well.

I
am an optimistic cynic - I hope for the best and plan for the
worst...



--
O'Reilly
Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm







From:
ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of WATSON,
BEN
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 8:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack
With the release of Vista to MSDN as well as the Microsoft
Licensing site
for download, I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should
be
quickly on the way soon for Vista. Anyone have any information on when
a
Vista compatible Adminpak will be available?
I would've run Vista Beta 2 full time on my work desktop to test
it out, but
with the inability to install the adminpak that severly limited Vista's
usefulness to me.
Thanks,
~Ben


List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
AD000001356User is Offline

Posts:0

11/22/2006 5:15 AM  
v\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
o\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
w\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
.shape {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
@font-face {
font-family: Wingdings;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Cambria Math;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Calibri;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Tahoma;
}
@page Section1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in; }
P.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
LI.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
A:link {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
A:visited {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
P {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; COLOR: black; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto
}
P.MsoListParagraph {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 34
}
LI.MsoListParagraph {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 34
}
DIV.MsoListParagraph {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 34
}
P.msochpdefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; COLOR: black; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-style-name: msochpdefault
}
LI.msochpdefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; COLOR: black; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-style-name: msochpdefault
}
DIV.msochpdefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; COLOR: black; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-style-name: msochpdefault
}
SPAN.emailstyle17 {
COLOR: windowtext; FONT-FAMILY: "Arial","sans-serif"; mso-style-name: emailstyle17
}
SPAN.emailstyle21 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-name: emailstyle21
}
SPAN.msoins0 {
COLOR: teal; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-name: msoins
}
SPAN.EmailStyle22 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal
}
SPAN.EmailStyle23 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal
}
SPAN.EmailStyle24 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal
}
SPAN.EmailStyle25 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal
}
SPAN.EmailStyle26 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal-reply
}
.MsoChpDefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-style-type: export-only
}
DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}
OL {
MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0in
}
UL {
MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0in
}






If I had to guess, I would say it's
because the launched process isn't a child of the elevated Window, but is a
child of Explorer (the shell) itself. This isn't the case with a CMD
prompt, whereby the launched process is an actual child process.

Test it with Sysinternals' process
explorer.
--Paul
----- Original Message -----
From:
joe

To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org

Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 10:49
PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin
Tools Pack

The Vista source isn't available for perusal yet so this
is a complete guess but I expect it is something likeExplorer purposely
"dumbs down"the process token used tolaunch thenew process.


Its just a guess though...



--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm




From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Grillenmeier,
GuidoSent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 2:56 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista
Admin Tools Pack


Steve
– thanks again for sharing this very useful information. I’ve tested
this with different scenarios and I am somewhat confused as to some of the
“great new features” of how Vista handles the security of new threads when
launching applications:

1.
I
can install the AdminPak as non-privileged local user and can fix the DLL
registration in an elevated CMD prompt with your tip below – works
fine.
2.
When
I install the AdminPak from an elevated CMD prompt right away, everything also
works fine – no need to manually register the DLLs.
3.
When
I start the AdminPak installation from an elevated Windows Explorer
window, it does not successfully register the DLLs and again I have to
register the DLLs manually in an elevated prompt to get them to
work
4.
When
I right-click the AdminPak installation file in a Windows Explorer window and
choose “Run as administrator” (i.e. running the install in elevated mode),
it’s the same as when launched from an elevated command prompt and again
everything work fine without the need for manual registration of
DLLs.

So
what’s different from launching applications from an elevated Windows Explorer
window to launching them from an elevated CMD prompt?

Thanks
for any insights J

/Guido



From:
ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of Steve LinehanSent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006
5:46 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE:
[ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

You
have to run the batch from a command prompt that is elevated or you will get
access denied. To run a cmd prompt elevated search for cmd.exe from the
start menu and right click selecting “Run As Administrator”. We have
also found that if you simply launch the MSI from an elevated command prompt
it will register the DLLs as well.

Thanks,

-Steve





From:
ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of WATSON, BENSent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006
9:25 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE:
[ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

I
found this write up from someone else yesterday, I can’t remember where
now. I tried it immediately and ran into a couple immediate errors when
trying to register these DLLs and the Active Directory snap-ins still
continued to be non-functional. This is using the Win2003 SP1 admin pack
on Vista Business RTM. Basically, I threw all those commands into a text
file named register.cmd and let it run.

Certtmpl.dll
– Your user account does not have necessary access rights to register the
Certificate Templates snap-in. Log on with a different user account and
try again, or contact your system administrator. (I am local admin on
this Vista box).

Mprsnap.dll
– Access is denied. (80070005)

Even
those two DLLs don’t seem to be related to the Active Directory snap-ins, I
still get the error that the MMC could not create the
snap-in.

Anyone
else run into this?

~Ben



From:
ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of Steve LinehanSent: Monday, November 20, 2006
10:39 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE:
[ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

KB
is in the works, just takes time. Feel free to blog it or I can if I get
some time this week, it is a bit slow this week but I have a backlog of
content that I was supposed to have blogged. Good news is that I
accepted a new role at Microsoft where maintaining an official blog is part of
my job. J

Thanks,

-Steve



From:
ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks
[MVP]Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 11:45 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista
Admin Tools Pack

okay if you aren't going to blog or KB that .. may someone
on this list?Steve Linehan wrote:
You
can install the Windows Server 2003 SP1 admin pack on Vista RTM, a shim was
added to support this. Once it is installed you will need to register
the DLLs needed for the various snap-ins manually from an elevated command
prompt. Here is a complete list in case you need
them:

regsvr32
/s adprop.dll
regsvr32
/s azroles.dll
regsvr32
/s azroleui.dll
regsvr32
/s ccfg95.dll
regsvr32
/s certadm.dll
regsvr32
/s certmmc.dll
regsvr32
/s certpdef.dll
regsvr32
/s certtmpl.dll
regsvr32
/s certxds.dll
regsvr32
/s cladmwiz.dll
regsvr32
/s clcfgsrv.dll
regsvr32
/s clnetrex.dll
regsvr32
/s cluadmex.dll
regsvr32
/s cluadmmc.dll
regsvr32
/s cmproxy.dll
regsvr32
/s cmroute.dll
regsvr32
/s cmutoa.dll
regsvr32
/s cnet16.dll
regsvr32
/s debugex.dll
regsvr32
/s dfscore.dll
regsvr32
/s dfsgui.dll
regsvr32
/s dhcpsnap.dll
regsvr32
/s dnsmgr.dll
regsvr32
/s domadmin.dll
regsvr32
/s dsadmin.dll
regsvr32
/s dsuiwiz.dll
regsvr32
/s imadmui.dll
regsvr32
/s lrwizdll.dll
regsvr32
/s mprsnap.dll
regsvr32
/s msclus.dll
regsvr32
/s mstsmhst.dll
regsvr32
/s mstsmmc.dll
regsvr32
/s nntpadm.dll
regsvr32
/s nntpapi.dll
regsvr32
/s nntpsnap.dll
regsvr32
/s ntdsbsrv.dll
regsvr32
/s ntfrsapi.dll
regsvr32
/s rasuser.dll
regsvr32
/s rigpsnap.dll
regsvr32
/s rsadmin.dll
regsvr32
/s rscommon.dll
regsvr32
/s rsconn.dll
regsvr32
/s rsengps.dll
regsvr32
/s rsjob.dll
regsvr32
/s rsservps.dll
regsvr32
/s rsshell.dll
regsvr32
/s rssubps.dll
regsvr32
/s rtrfiltr.dll
regsvr32
/s schmmgmt.dll
regsvr32
/s tapisnap.dll
regsvr32
/s tsuserex.dll
regsvr32
/s uddi.mmc.dll
regsvr32
/s vsstskex.dll
regsvr32
/s w95inf16.dll
regsvr32
/s w95inf32.dll
regsvr32
/s winsevnt.dll
regsvr32
/s winsmon.dll
regsvr32
/s winsrpc.dll
regsvr32
/s winssnap.dll
regsvr32
/s ws03res.dll

Thanks,

-Steve



From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of joeSent: Monday, November 20, 2006 9:47
PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject:
RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack

>
I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should be quickly on
the way soon for Vista

Errr....
That struck me a little funny... What exactly in the past would make you even
start to assume this. ;o)

History
has taught us exactly the opposite though we have been quite vocal in the
complaints on the lack of left/right hand coordination on this topic.


If we
have something prior to LongHorn RTM I think we will be doing pretty well.


I am
an optimistic cynic - I hope for the best and plan for the worst...



--
O'Reilly
Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm







From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org]
On Behalf Of WATSON, BENSent: Saturday, November 18, 2006
8:58 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject:
[OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack
With the release of Vista to MSDN as well as the Microsoft Licensing site
for download, I would assume that an Administration Tools Pack should be
quickly on the way soon for Vista. Anyone have any information on when a
Vista compatible Adminpak will be available?
I would've run Vista Beta 2 full time on my work desktop to test it out,
but with the inability to install the adminpak that severly limited Vista's
usefulness to me.
Thanks,
~Ben
List info :
http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ :
http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 2 of 2<< < 12

Forums >ActiveDir Mail List Archive >List Archives > [ActiveDir] [OT] Vista Admin Tools Pack



ActiveForums 3.7
Friends

Friends

VisualClickButoton
Members

Members

MembershipMembership:
Latest New UserLatest:cajoe64
New TodayNew Today:0
New YesterdayNew Yesterday:0
User CountOverall:5291

People OnlinePeople Online:
VisitorsVisitors:50
MembersMembers:0
TotalTotal:50

Online NowOnline Now:

Ads

Copyright 2012 ActiveDir.org
Terms Of Use