List Archives

This forum is an archive of all posts to our mailing list over the past few years. The forum is set read only therefore to contribute you will need to join our list community. See more info about this here.

List Archives

Unanswered Active Topics

Forums Search

Forums >ActiveDir Mail List Archive >List Archives

Subject: RE : RE: RE : RE: [ActiveDir] Aging/Scavenging on _msdcs. URGENT

Prev Next

You are not authorized to post a reply.

Author

Messages

boubbha

Posts:29

04/17/2008 12:26 PM
Thx. Any idea on how to know in advance how many and what records will be scavenged ? (ldifde, script,etc..) Just to identify exactly what will be deleted from DNS. Thx and have a nice day. Yann Chris Dent <chris@highorbit.co.uk> a écrit : If Aging isn't enabled on a zone the TimeStamp value is, as far as I'm aware, not replicated. It's worth turning on View / Advanced when configuring Aging. A value is set to state that the zone cannot be scavenged before a certain date, found under the Aging window. It's used to ensure full replication of TimeStamps has completed prior to the first Scavenging attempt and should be the value of the Refresh interval + 1 hour (or there abouts). Chris -----Original Message----- From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org on behalf of Yann Sent: Thu 17/04/2008 16:23 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE : RE: [ActiveDir] Aging/Scavenging on _msdcs. URGENT OK,Thx for your answer Chris. Last Q. I have found several of my DCs with a Registration Timestamp set to 2007/07/20 on their A records (. dns zone). I know that these DCs are up & running and it seems that no refresh to their A record have been done... Any clues why operationnal DCs did not refresh their records ? Many thx. Yann Chris Dent a écrit : 1. First bit: Yep, it is. Second bit: That's the Registration Timestamp, not the deletion timestamp. What are you thinking of setting Aging to? Service Records will be Refreshed / Updated by the Domain Controllers once every 24 hours. I recommend you consider leaving the default 7 Days No-Refresh and 7 Days Refresh there. At any point during either interval the record will accept an Update request so changes are still no problem. 2. All Dynamically Added records are effected by Aging / Scavenging. Only static records (records with no time-stamp) are immune. -----Original Message----- From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org on behalf of Yann Sent: Thu 17/04/2008 15:33 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Aging/Scavenging on _msdcs. URGENT Hello, We are about to activate the aging/scavenging on our DNS AD-integrated. questions: 1) is it safe to activate aging/scavenging on _msdcs. ? I have many srv records that are timestamped to be deleted on 2008/04/10. 2) will clustered servers will also be affected by aging/scavenging ? Thx __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? En finir avec le spam? Yahoo! Mail vous offre la meilleure protection possible contre les messages non sollicités http://mail.yahoo.fr Yahoo! Mail __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? En finir avec le spam? Yahoo! Mail vous offre la meilleure protection possible contre les messages non sollicités http://mail.yahoo.fr Yahoo! Mail __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? En finir avec le spam? Yahoo! Mail vous offre la meilleure protection possible contre les messages non sollicités http://mail.yahoo.fr Yahoo! Mail

You are not authorized to post a reply.

Forums >ActiveDir Mail List Archive >List Archives > RE : RE: RE : RE: [ActiveDir] Aging/Scavenging on _msdcs. URGENT

ActiveForums 3.7

Syndicate

Friends

List Archives

List Archives

Friends

Members

Articles

Related Links

Ads