Location: List Archives

List Archives

This forum is an archive of all posts to our mailing list over the past few years.  The forum is set read only therefore to contribute you will need to join our list community.  See more info about this here.

List Archives

Subject: RE: AD: RE: [ActiveDir] McMaster's:AD
Prev Next
You are not authorized to post a reply.

AuthorMessages
GilUser is Offline

Posts:77

09/24/2008 1:21 PM  
March 2009 in Vegas, September 2009 in Berlin. See http://www.tec2009.com for info.

-gil

-----Original Message-----
From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Roelf Zomerman
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 10:22 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: AD: RE: [ActiveDir] McMaster's:AD

So when's the next one.. and where..

-----Original Message-----
From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Laura E. Hunter
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 2:00 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: AD: RE: [ActiveDir] McMaster's:AD

No, we will never "let it go", for you have taught us that if we whine
enough, we get Vegas back. You, sir, are an enabler. ;-) <---
(Kindly note winkie.)

On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Gil Kirkpatrick <gilk@netpro.com> wrote:
> Yes I know that, hence the smiley. You restrained yourself admirably J <-
> Note smiley. It indicates humorous intent.
>
>
>
> DS PG representation was down a bit, overall PG representation was up, and
> overall MSFT participation was substantially up. It probably had more to do
> with where the products were in their respective release cycles more than
> anything else.
>
>
>
> -g
>
>
>
> From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
> [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of joe
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 9:26 AM
>
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: AD: RE: [ActiveDir] McMaster's:AD
>
>
>
> I wasn't whining, in fact, I went out of my way not to whine...
> "without dissing Chicago in Winter/Spring, the major one being that Vegas is
> just a puddle jump from Redmond"
>
>
>
> I don't think you can argue that the DS PG representation wasn't as
> extensive for Chicago as it was at Red Rock. It was still better than any
> other conference as stated by the PG Managers themselves, but it was down.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
> http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
> [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Gil Kirkpatrick
> Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 6:11 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: AD: RE: [ActiveDir] McMaster's:AD
>
> Always with the whining about Chicago.... Jeez, would you people let it go
> already? J
>
>
>
> -g
>
>
>
>
>
> From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
> [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of joe
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 12:54 AM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: AD: RE: [ActiveDir] McMaster's:AD
>
>
>
> Correction #1
>
>
>
> That should be "last year in Chicago was a little light"
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
> http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
> [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of joe
> Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 10:45 AM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: AD: RE: [ActiveDir] McMaster's:AD
>
> I have to agree with Gil.
>
>
>
> Paying for DEC (still trying to choke down the TEC name - its sort of like
> trying to rename ADAM to me...) is paying for the forum in which a bunch of
> techno folks get together and talk and where the AD Consumers get to talk to
> the people they read about or otherwise know about in the field. The product
> team is one group of techo folks who choose to come to DEC and the presence
> they commit is astounding, last year in Vegas was a little light but the
> year before at Red Rock we had fantastic turnout from the DS Team. That made
> sense from a variety of standpoints, without dissing Chicago in
> Winter/Spring, the major one being that Vegas is just a puddle jump from
> Redmond.
>
>
>
> I know it is a fact that DEC provides great value for the PG to be there
> having talked to several of the PG folks specifically about it and seeing
> the take aways that come from DEC. The feedback they get there is very
> relevant to them and something they really focus on. They aren't taking all
> the notes for their own health. They understand that there are a lot of
> heavy duty AD Talent and consumers there and it is worth their time to
> attend and get and better yet, understand from the consumers viewpoint, what
> the feedback is.
>
>
>
> There has always been a strong tie between the DS MVPs, DS PG, and
> the participants at DEC. I've said it more than once, that the between
> session and after hours in the bar banter with everyone is the best part of
> the whole thing. You will find the MSFT PG folks knee deep in that and for
> the most part loving it. I don't know of any other conference that I have
> personally attended over the last 10 years that touches it. I would actually
> relish the idea of Motel 6 with beer and pizza. No formal sessions, just
> people getting together and talking about what is going on. I understand the
> formal sessions are a chance to give people more focus on what to discuss
> though as well as to possibly introduce folks to things that they may not
> have otherwise been aware of. I absolutely love DEC and talking to all of
> the people, I just don't like having to get up in front of audiences and
> speak there, it isn't me, that is a Dean thing to be in the spot light.
> I much rather just sit in the bar and talk to folks or mingle in the between
> sessions and hang out in the birds of a feather sessions in more intimate
> conversation settings.
>
>
>
> I saw a post the other day that said the formal speaking sessions are now
> posted and went out and looked and saw we have Brett Shirley and Dmitri
> Gavrilov speaking which blew me away. Those should be some extremely
> interesting sessions though they won't be for the faint of heart; especially
> Brett's sessions. Most people can spell ESE but can't pronounce it nor have
> any real understanding of what is going on in it and honestly, because
> things have been done so well they for the most part don't even need to know
> what is going on with it.... it isn't like SQL Server where you have to go
> in and muck with it all the time. It just works. :)
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
> http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
> [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Gil Kirkpatrick
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 7:23 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: AD: RE: [ActiveDir] McMaster's:AD
>
> Not really... it depends on the thrust of the conference. WindowsConnections
> doesn't usually have much in the way of program management presence, for
> example. TEC/DEC/whatever J has a strong program management presence because
> we view the MSFT program management teams as one of our core constituents,
> and we organize the conference so it provides value to the product teams as
> well as to the attendees.
>
>
>
> In the case of TEC, the $$ just lets us have the event in nicer places with
> better food and facilities. My original idea for DEC was a Motel 6 and beer
> and pizza. J
>
>
>
> -gil
>
>
>
> From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
> [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Mark Parris (L)
> Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2008 2:50 AM
> To: ActiveDir
> Subject: Re: AD: RE: [ActiveDir] McMaster's:AD
>
>
>
> Is that not always a by-product of a $$££ event?
>
> TechED to a certain extent but "DEC/TEC Whatever" it is very much the case.
>
> I am not saying it is a bad thing, it's just the way it happens.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark Parris
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: "joe" <listmail@joeware.net>
> Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 12:18:01 -0400
> To: <ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>
> Subject: RE: AD: RE: [ActiveDir] McMaster's:AD
>
> I can see the advertising now... Pay X dollars now and you too can have
> product team interaction...
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
> http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
> [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Brandon Shell
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 12:07 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: Re: AD: RE: [ActiveDir] McMaster's:AD
>
> I personally would favor the idea of always keeping it in Redmond. That
> could help keep the quality of material and attendees at a high level. One
> would also expect, at that level, some form of product group relation so the
> PM contacts would be a great selling point.
>
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Chris Ransom <chrisran@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
> There will be more locations next year, but nothing official yet. Coming to
> Redmond also means you get to see the main campus, and potentially Program
> Managers...
>
>
>
> Chris Ransom
>
> Senior Premier Field Engineer - Active Directory
>
> South Central District - San Antonio
>
> US Central Premier Field Engineering
>
> Email: chrisran@microsoft.com
>
> Cell: 210.482.0157
>
> Fax: 425.708.5237
>
> Blog: http://mschrisran.spaces.live.com
>
>
>
> From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
> [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Steven Griffiths
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 10:38 AM
> To: activedir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: AD: RE: [ActiveDir] McMaster's:AD
>
>
>
> Chris,
>
> Is it planned that there will be some UK-based trainig for this program at
> some point in the future?
>
> Steve G
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: chrisran@microsoft.com
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> CC: Walter.Boyd@microsoft.com
> Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 08:10:12 -0700
> Subject: RE: AD: RE: [ActiveDir] McMaster's:AD
>
> Registration site is open, and the November Rotation is half off...
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/learning/mcp/master/register/default.mspx
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Chris Ransom
>
> Senior Premier Field Engineer - Active Directory
>
> South Central District - San Antonio
>
> US Central Premier Field Engineering
>
> Email: chrisran@microsoft.com
>
> Cell: 210.482.0157
>
> Fax: 425.708.5237
>
> Blog: http://mschrisran.spaces.live.com
>
>
>
> From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
> [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Mark Parris (L)
> Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2008 8:35 AM
> To: ActiveDir
> Cc: Walter Boyd
> Subject: Re: AD: RE: [ActiveDir] McMaster's:AD
>
>
>
> Chris,
>
> Many thanks and please keep any relevant content coming.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark Parris
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Chris Ransom <chrisran@microsoft.com>
> Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 05:42:02 -0700
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org<ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>
> CC: Walter Boyd<Walter.Boyd@microsoft.com>
> Subject: RE: AD: RE: [ActiveDir] McMaster's:AD
>
> I'll throw a couple samples out of level 300 content in a module, there will
> be more produced after the July rotation, and for sure before the November
> Public class.
>
>
>
> I'm writing these on the fly, and they are not out of our documentation yet,
> so take it for what it's worth:
>
>
>
> 1) AD Replication
>
> a. Understand Replication Internals
>
> i. Be
> able to troubleshoot and repair broken replication for common issues (secure
> channel, beyond TSL, name resolution dependencies ,etc)
>
> ii.
> Understand USN Rollback, and how to correct any potential failure points
>
> b. Understand design concerns around Sites & Services topology
>
> i.
> Effectively use BASL, Sites Links, Site Costing, Change Notification or
> other advanced features.
>
> 2) FRS or DFSR
>
> a. Understand how FRS and DFSR function (and differ)
>
> i.
> Understand common issues with FRS, and how to repair them, such as Journal
> Wrap, Morphed Folder, and Auth/Non Auth Restore.
>
>
>
> Those are a couple samples which might help set the tone for level 300
> scenarios. Remember the class will start content at 300, but will go in and
> out of 300-350.
>
>
>
> The overall gist is you should be able to "design", deploy, maintain, and
> fix things that are broken in most of the 5 categories (ADDS, ADLDS, ADFS,
> ADCS, ADRMS).
>
> ADRMS, ADFS, and ADCS will most likely have the highest level of newbie's
> during the class, and we understand that so the content for those will most
> likely slip back to level 250, so there are more basics, but for the ADDS
> you should really know your stuff.
>
>
>
> I'll work with Walter Boyd (PM for MCM:Directory, and reports to Per), and
> see if we can publish our Objective Domain once it is finished.
>
>
>
> Let me know if you have more questions,
>
>
>
> Chris Ransom
>
> Microsoft Certified Master - Windows Server 2008 - Directory
>
> Senior Premier Field Engineer - Active Directory
>
> US Central Premier Field Engineering
>
> Microsoft Services
>
> Email: chrisran@microsoft.com
>
>
>
>
>
> From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
> [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Mark Parris (L)
> Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2008 2:00 AM
> To: ActiveDir
> Subject: Re: AD: RE: [ActiveDir] McMaster's:AD
>
>
>
> Chris,
>
> What I really would like to know is a little bit more about the area's to
> study. I was at TechED and I heard Per's talk and I spoke with Trika so I
> understand the basics.
>
> The page on MSLearning is I feel a little nondescript in what content to
> learn or exact level of detail required.
>
> Prerequisites Experience
>
> Five or more years of hands-on experience with Windows Active Directory:
> installing, designing, configuring, and trouble shooting
>
> A thorough understanding of Windows Active Directory design and architecture
>
> A 300-level understanding of site component topology, forest operations and
> topology, Active Directory distributed file system, file replication
> services, security, client interactions, and Group Policy
>
> A basic understanding of Active Directory Certificate Services, Rights
> Management Services, Active Directory Federated Services, and ADAM/Active
> Directory Lightweight Directory Services
>
> Functional skills in basic protocol analysis, Hyper-V, scripting PKI, and IP
> addressing and routing
>
> Speak, understand, and write in fluent English
>
> It would be really good if this could be broken down into:
>
> 1. What a basic understanding actually means?
>
> 2. Functional skills - i.e. does this mean you have to be a guru or just
> that you can power on a VM?
>
> 3. A break down of what the level 300 content requires you to know, i.e.
> make sure you know replication inside out, know how to permission the AD,
> read SDDL for fun,
>
> I know it's in its infancy but it is something I would like to acheive and
> if and when I can get on it - I would like to be as prepared as I can be.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark Parris
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Chris Ransom <chrisran@microsoft.com>
> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:57:20 -0700
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org<ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>
> Subject: AD: RE: [ActiveDir] McMaster's:AD
>
> What do you want to know about it?
>
>
>
> I'm working on finalizing the training content for the July rotation (which
> starts tomorrow), as we speak.
>
> And I wrote most of the lab exam, and some content for the first rotation.
> So ask, and we will see what if I can answer..
>
>
>
> Chris Ransom
>
> Microsoft Certified Master - Windows Server 2008 - Directory
>
> Senior Premier Field Engineer - Active Directory
>
> US Central Premier Field Engineering
>
> Microsoft Services
>
> Email: chrisran@microsoft.com
>
>
>
>
>
> From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
> [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Roelf Zomerman
> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 8:49 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] McMaster's:AD
>
>
>
> Well I can tell you more in the coming days and next two weeks (if they
> allow me).. cause guess what! Me is in redmond Right Now for that course!
>
>
>
> Indeed first year only in redmond, three written exams as far as I know now.
> You can try the exams again.. but it's gonna cost 250 per written en 1500
> for the final lab.
>
>
>
> More info:
> http://blogs.msdn.com/trika/archive/2008/06/26/more-on-the-certified-master-programs-from-me-per-the-program-owner.aspx
>
>
>
> -Roelf
>
>
>
> From: ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org
> [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 6:22 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] McMaster's:AD
>
>
>
> The 18K buys you three weeks of classroom training/labs, two or three
> written exams, and a lab practical. It's a couple grand more to try again if
> you don't pass. First year it's only being offered in Redmond. Supposedly WW
> after that.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Brian Desmond
> brian@briandesmond.com
>
> c - 312.731.3132
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Mark Parris (L) <lists@baseit.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Does anyone on the list hold the MCM:AD title as of yet? (People do!)
>
> Anyone planning on taking it?
>
> What was the experience like?
>
> What are people using to study?
>
> Any insider information?
>
> What does $18500 buy you (no airplane humour please)?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark Parris
>
>
> List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ma/default.aspx
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> Try Facebook in Windows Live Messenger! Try it Now!
>
>



--
-----------------------
Laura E. Hunter
Architect, Oxford Computer Group (http://www.oxfordcomputergroup.com)
Microsoft MVP, Directory Services
(https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/laura)
Author, Active Directory Consultant's Field Guide (http://tinyurl.com/7f8ll)
Author, Active Directory Cookbook, Second Edition (http://tinyurl.com/z7svl)
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ma/default.aspx
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ma/default.aspx
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ma/default.aspx
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Forums >ActiveDir Mail List Archive >List Archives > RE: AD: RE: [ActiveDir] McMaster's:AD



ActiveForums 3.7
AdventNet Banner
Friends

Friends

Namescape
Members

Members

MembershipMembership:
Latest New UserLatest:rwrabinowitz
New TodayNew Today:1
New YesterdayNew Yesterday:1
User CountOverall:4273

People OnlinePeople Online:
VisitorsVisitors:302
MembersMembers:0
TotalTotal:302

Online NowOnline Now:

Ads

Copyright 2008 ActiveDir.org
Terms Of Use