| Author | Messages | |
AD00000893
Posts:0
 | | 09/21/2005 12:07 PM |
| For small networks with 250 nodes or less, what/how are you all
protecting your servers? Windows firewall, 3rd part vendor, or just
standard Windows security?
-Z.V.
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ | | | |
| prenouf
Posts:2
| | 09/21/2005 2:18 AM |
| | Message body was not found. | | | |
| lvega@xxxx.yyy
| | 09/21/2005 2:22 AM |
| I have a small network but using a Cisco Pix to protect the network.
The Pix is fairly easy to manage once you get used to the PDM and console
configuration isn't bad either if you prefer no GUI.
r/
Lou
-----Original Message-----
From: ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Za Vue
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 7:58 AM
To: ActiveDir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ActiveDir] Firewall
For small networks with 250 nodes or less, what/how are you all
protecting your servers? Windows firewall, 3rd part vendor, or just
standard Windows security?
-Z.V.
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ | | | |
| AD00000893
Posts:0
| | 09/21/2005 2:36 AM |
| Securing the network from other subnets and the Internet. Switches and
routers are managed by another team.
-Z.V.
Phil Renouf wrote:
You mean securing your network from the internet? Or is this
just an internal security question?
Phil
On 9/21/05, Za Vue
wrote:
For
small networks with 250 nodes or less, what/how are you all
protecting your servers? Windows firewall, 3rd part vendor, or just
standard Windows security?
-Z.V.
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ | | | |
| bdesmond
Posts:996
| | 09/21/2005 2:46 AM |
| This sort of application is something that a little Pix works well for -
something like a 515E.
I've also seen a bunch of those Sonicwalls and Fireboxes as well in this
market.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
c - 312.731.3132
-----Original Message-----
From: ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Za Vue
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 7:58 AM
To: ActiveDir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ActiveDir] Firewall
For small networks with 250 nodes or less, what/how are you all
protecting your servers? Windows firewall, 3rd part vendor, or just
standard Windows security?
-Z.V.
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ | | | |
| AD000001290
Posts:0
| | 09/21/2005 3:31 AM |
| Does "protecting" mean:
Anti Virus
Anti Spam
Firewall
DoS protection
etc etc
or all of the above?
neil
-----Original Message-----
From: ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Za Vue
Sent: 21 September 2005 12:58
To: ActiveDir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ActiveDir] Firewall
For small networks with 250 nodes or less, what/how are you all
protecting your servers? Windows firewall, 3rd part vendor, or just
standard Windows security?
-Z.V.
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confidential and
intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended
recipient of this email please notify the sender immediately and delete your
copy from your system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further
action in reliance on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and
Nomura International plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent permitted by law,
accept responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of,
or (b) the presence of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling
code in, this message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this
email is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated
this email: (1) is not, and should not be treated or relied upon as,
investment research; (2) contains views or opinions that are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended
for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or
offer to buy or sell securities or related financial instruments. NIplc
does not provide investment services to private customers. Authorised and
regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registered in England
no. 1550505 VAT No. 447 2492 35. Registered Office: 1 St Martin's-le-Grand,
London, EC1A 4NP. A member of the Nomura group of companies.
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ | | | |
| prenouf
Posts:2
| | 09/21/2005 4:13 AM |
| Phil
On 9/21/05, Brian Desmond wrote:
This sort of application is something that a little Pix works well for -something like a 515E.
I've also seen a bunch of those Sonicwalls and Fireboxes as well in thismarket.Thanks,Brian Desmondbrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxc - 312.731.3132
-----Original Message-----From: ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
] On Behalf Of Za VueSent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 7:58 AMTo: ActiveDir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: [ActiveDir] FirewallFor small networks with 250 nodes or less, what/how are you all
protecting your servers? Windows firewall, 3rd part vendor, or juststandard Windows security?-Z.V.List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspxList archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspxList FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspxList archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ | | | |
| AD00000893
Posts:0
| | 09/21/2005 4:28 AM |
| Firewall, DoS
neil.ruston@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Does "protecting" mean:
Anti Virus
Anti Spam
Firewall
DoS protection
etc etc
or all of the above?
neil
-----Original Message-----
From: ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Za Vue
Sent: 21 September 2005 12:58
To: ActiveDir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ActiveDir] Firewall
For small networks with 250 nodes or less, what/how are you all
protecting your servers? Windows firewall, 3rd part vendor, or just
standard Windows security?
-Z.V.
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confidential and
intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended
recipient of this email please notify the sender immediately and delete your
copy from your system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further
action in reliance on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and
Nomura International plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent permitted by law,
accept responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of,
or (b) the presence of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling
code in, this message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this
email is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated
this email: (1) is not, and should not be treated or relied upon as,
investment research; (2) contains views or opinions that are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended
for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or
offer to buy or sell securities or related financial instruments. NIplc
does not provide investment services to private customers. Authorised and
regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registered in England
no. 1550505 VAT No. 447 2492 35. Registered Office: 1 St Martin's-le-Grand,
London, EC1A 4NP. A member of the Nomura group of companies.
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ | | | |
| bdesmond
Posts:996
| | 09/21/2005 6:07 AM |
| Yeah, a Nokia running Checkpoint is really expensive, and probably way
out of budget for what the OP is looking for if I had to hazard a guess. I
think Pix and Checkpoint and others all have their places. For a small business
looking for an Internet firewall, I think a mid-end pix fits the bill pretty
well.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
c -
312.731.3132
From:
ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Phil Renouf
Sent: Wednesday, September 21,
2005 11:03 AM
To: ActiveDir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Firewall
I don't like Pix's, hate how they are managed and I think the interface
is bad.
I prefer Netscreen and Nokia (or a server running Checkpoint, but the
Nokias are better for most instances). For a small company ISA Server might be
an option as well, it is a lot better in the latest version than it was in the
past. I still like little appliances like the Nokia though.
Phil
On 9/21/05, Brian Desmond brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This sort of application is something that a little Pix works well for
-
something like a 515E.
I've also seen a bunch of those Sonicwalls and Fireboxes as well in this
market.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
c - 312.731.3132
-----Original Message-----
From: ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
] On Behalf Of Za Vue
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 7:58 AM
To: ActiveDir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ActiveDir] Firewall
For small networks with 250 nodes or less, what/how are you all
protecting your servers? Windows firewall, 3rd part vendor, or just
standard Windows security?
-Z.V.
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ | | | |
| bdesmond
Posts:996
| | 09/22/2005 1:01 AM |
| I™ve used the Netscreen SMB stuff and the SonicWalls once. Saw a
Netgear one but didn™t play with it and the interface suggested it had a
pretty good feature set. Agreed they™re all worth looking at. Its ahrd to
recommend any one make/model without some more solid requirements from the OP
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
c -
312.731.3132
From:
ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Medeiros, Jose
Sent: Wednesday, September 21,
2005 8:33 PM
To: ActiveDir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Firewall
Don't forget Netscreen, Sonic Wall and the
Netgear Pro line.. both offer some very nice features with ease of management.
Jose
-----Original Message-----
From:
ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Phil Renouf
Sent: Wednesday, September 21,
2005 5:17 PM
To: ActiveDir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Firewall
Nokia and Pix are similarly priced at the low end.
Phil
On 9/21/05, Brian Desmond brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yeah, a Nokia
running Checkpoint is really expensive, and probably way out of budget for what
the OP is looking for if I had to hazard a guess. I think Pix and Checkpoint
and others all have their places. For a small business looking for an Internet
firewall, I think a mid-end pix fits the bill pretty well.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
c -
312.731.3132
From: ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Phil Renouf
Sent: Wednesday, September 21,
2005 11:03 AM
To: ActiveDir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Firewall
I don't
like Pix's, hate how they are managed and I think the interface is bad.
I prefer
Netscreen and Nokia (or a server running Checkpoint, but the Nokias are better
for most instances). For a small company ISA Server might be an option as well,
it is a lot better in the latest version than it was in the past. I still like
little appliances like the Nokia though.
Phil
On
9/21/05, Brian
Desmond brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This sort
of application is something that a little Pix works well for -
something like a 515E.
I've also seen a bunch of those Sonicwalls and Fireboxes as well in this
market.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
c - 312.731.3132
-----Original Message-----
From: ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:
ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ] On Behalf Of Za Vue
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 7:58 AM
To: ActiveDir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ActiveDir] Firewall
For small networks with 250 nodes or less, what/how are you all
protecting your servers? Windows firewall, 3rd part vendor, or just
standard Windows security?
-Z.V.
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ | | | |
| prenouf
Posts:2
| | 09/22/2005 3:32 AM |
| Phil
On 9/21/05, Brian Desmond wrote:
I'm only familiar with their higher end stuff. I didn't know they even had a lowend appliance. What do they call them?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
c - 312.731.3132
From:
ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Phil RenoufSent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 8:17 PM
To: ActiveDir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Firewall
Nokia and Pix are similarly priced at the low end.
Phil
On 9/21/05, Brian Desmond wrote:
Yeah, a Nokia running Checkpoint is really expensive, and probably way out of budget for what the OP is looking for if I had to hazard a guess. I think Pix and Checkpoint and others all have their places. For a small business looking for an Internet firewall, I think a mid-end pix fits the bill pretty well.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
c - 312.731.3132
From:
ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Phil RenoufSent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 11:03 AMTo:
ActiveDir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] Firewall
I don't like Pix's, hate how they are managed and I think the interface is bad.
I prefer Netscreen and Nokia (or a server running Checkpoint, but the Nokias are better for most instances). For a small company ISA Server might be an option as well, it is a lot better in the latest version than it was in the past. I still like little appliances like the Nokia though.
Phil
On 9/21/05, Brian Desmond wrote:
This sort of application is something that a little Pix works well for -something like a 515E.I've also seen a bunch of those Sonicwalls and Fireboxes as well in this
market.Thanks,Brian Desmondbrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxc - 312.731.3132
-----Original Message-----From: ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx[mailto:
ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ] On Behalf Of Za VueSent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 7:58 AMTo:
ActiveDir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: [ActiveDir] FirewallFor small networks with 250 nodes or less, what/how are you all protecting your servers? Windows firewall, 3rd part vendor, or juststandard Windows security?
-Z.V.List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspxList FAQ :
http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspxList archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspxList FAQ :
http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspxList archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ | | | |
| prenouf
Posts:2
| | 09/22/2005 12:21 PM |
| Yeah, a Nokia running Checkpoint is really expensive, and probably way out of budget for what the OP is looking for if I had to hazard a guess. I think Pix and Checkpoint and others all have their places. For a small business looking for an Internet firewall, I think a mid-end pix fits the bill pretty well.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
c - 312.731.3132
From:
ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Phil RenoufSent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 11:03 AMTo:
ActiveDir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] Firewall
I don't like Pix's, hate how they are managed and I think the interface is bad.
I prefer Netscreen and Nokia (or a server running Checkpoint, but the Nokias are better for most instances). For a small company ISA Server might be an option as well, it is a lot better in the latest version than it was in the past. I still like little appliances like the Nokia though.
Phil
On 9/21/05, Brian Desmond wrote:
This sort of application is something that a little Pix works well for -something like a 515E.I've also seen a bunch of those Sonicwalls and Fireboxes as well in this
market.Thanks,Brian Desmondbrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxc - 312.731.3132
-----Original Message-----From: ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx[mailto:
ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ] On Behalf Of Za VueSent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 7:58 AMTo:
ActiveDir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: [ActiveDir] FirewallFor small networks with 250 nodes or less, what/how are you all protecting your servers? Windows firewall, 3rd part vendor, or juststandard Windows security?
-Z.V.List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspxList FAQ :
http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspxList archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspxList FAQ :
http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspxList archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ | | | |
| jmedeiros@xxxx.yyy
| | 09/22/2005 12:41 PM |
| Don't
forget Netscreen, Sonic Wall and the Netgear Pro line.. both offer some very
nice features with ease of management.
Jose
-----Original Message-----From:
ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Phil
RenoufSent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 5:17 PMTo:
ActiveDir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: Re: [ActiveDir]
Firewall
Nokia and Pix are similarly priced at the low end.
Phil
On 9/21/05, Brian
Desmond brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Yeah, a Nokia
running Checkpoint is really expensive, and probably way out of budget for
what the OP is looking for if I had to hazard a guess. I think Pix and
Checkpoint and others all have their places. For a small business looking
for an Internet firewall, I think a mid-end pix fits the bill pretty well.
Thanks,
Brian
Desmond
brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
c -
312.731.3132
From: ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Phil RenoufSent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005
11:03 AMTo:
ActiveDir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: Re: [ActiveDir]
Firewall
I don't
like Pix's, hate how they are managed and I think the interface is
bad.
I
prefer Netscreen and Nokia (or a server running Checkpoint, but the Nokias
are better for most instances). For a small company ISA Server might be an
option as well, it is a lot better in the latest version than it was in the
past. I still like little appliances like the Nokia though.
Phil
On 9/21/05, Brian
Desmond
brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This
sort of application is something that a little Pix works well for
-something like a 515E.I've also seen a bunch of those
Sonicwalls and Fireboxes as well in this market.Thanks,Brian
Desmondbrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxc -
312.731.3132-----Original Message-----From: ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx[mailto:
ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ] On Behalf Of Za VueSent:
Wednesday, September 21, 2005 7:58 AMTo: ActiveDir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: [ActiveDir]
FirewallFor small networks with 250 nodes or less, what/how are you
all protecting your servers? Windows firewall, 3rd part vendor, or
juststandard Windows security? -Z.V.List
info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspxList
FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspxList archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspxList
FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspxList archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ | | | |
| bdesmond
Posts:996
| | 09/22/2005 12:49 PM |
| I™m only familiar with their higher end stuff. I didn™t know
they even had a lowend appliance. What do they call them?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
c -
312.731.3132
From:
ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Phil Renouf
Sent: Wednesday, September 21,
2005 8:17 PM
To: ActiveDir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Firewall
Nokia and Pix are similarly priced at the low end.
Phil
On 9/21/05, Brian Desmond brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yeah, a Nokia
running Checkpoint is really expensive, and probably way out of budget for what
the OP is looking for if I had to hazard a guess. I think Pix and Checkpoint
and others all have their places. For a small business looking for an Internet
firewall, I think a mid-end pix fits the bill pretty well.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
c -
312.731.3132
From: ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Phil Renouf
Sent: Wednesday, September 21,
2005 11:03 AM
To: ActiveDir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Firewall
I don't
like Pix's, hate how they are managed and I think the interface is bad.
I prefer
Netscreen and Nokia (or a server running Checkpoint, but the Nokias are better
for most instances). For a small company ISA Server might be an option as well,
it is a lot better in the latest version than it was in the past. I still like
little appliances like the Nokia though.
Phil
On
9/21/05, Brian
Desmond brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This sort
of application is something that a little Pix works well for -
something like a 515E.
I've also seen a bunch of those Sonicwalls and Fireboxes as well in this
market.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
c - 312.731.3132
-----Original Message-----
From: ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:
ActiveDir-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ] On Behalf Of Za Vue
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 7:58 AM
To: ActiveDir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ActiveDir] Firewall
For small networks with 250 nodes or less, what/how are you all
protecting your servers? Windows firewall, 3rd part vendor, or just
standard Windows security?
-Z.V.
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ | | | |
|
|