List Archives

This forum is an archive of all posts to our mailing list over the past few years. The forum is set read only therefore to contribute you will need to join our list community. See more info about this here.

When subscribed to the list you should use your standard email client to send your posts to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org.

List Archives

Unanswered Active Topics

Forums Search

Forums >ActiveDir Mail List Archive >List Archives

Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Revisiting the infamous topic of multiple child domains vs Single domain forest

Prev Next

You are not authorized to post a reply.

Author

Messages

scharique

Posts:0

07/08/2009 1:53 PM
Hi Chris, Yes, it indeed is ".int". You bring up a very good point, but management is not keen on rendom-ing the domain, least I might be able to do is to consolidate into root. Had I been part of the team when this all was designed, I might have also chosen to go for anonymous company name instead of the new merger company's name. Thanks, On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 4:58 AM, Chris Dent <chris@highorbit.co.uk> wrote: > > Hi Rick, > > Are they really using ".int"? > > If you have any chance I strongly recommend you ditch that. > > .int is a public TLD reserved for organisations formed by international > treaty. Should you ever need to obtain a certificate from a public authority > you'll bump into the problem that you cannot prove ownership of that domain > and therefore cannot get a cerificate. > > Perhaps unlikely, but a forest might exist for years and including > something like that would, in my opinion, seem like very poor planning. > > Chris >

You are not authorized to post a reply.

Forums >ActiveDir Mail List Archive >List Archives > Re: [ActiveDir] Revisiting the infamous topic of multiple child domains vs Single domain forest

ActiveForums 3.7

Syndicate

Friends

List Archives

List Archives

Friends

Members

Articles

Related Links

Ads